Teng Kathryn A, Butler Robert S, Schramm Sarah, Isaacson J Harry, Nielsen Craig, Paradis Carmen
From the Department of Internal Medicine, Quantitative Health Sciences, Medicine Institute, and the Department of Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
South Med J. 2014 May;107(5):301-5. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000095.
How physicians provide longitudinal primary care to physician-patients (ie, physicians as patients) has not been well studied. The potential challenges of providing care to physician-patients include maintaining professional boundaries and adhering to practice guidelines. The objective was to explore the differences in identifying how physicians perceive caring for physicians-patients in the longitudinal setting versus caring for other patients in the general population.
The study consisted of focus groups, followed by quantitative survey. Participants were primary care physicians (internal medicine and family medicine) at an academic multispecialty group practice. Thematic analysis of focus groups informed the development of the survey.
In focus groups, participants identified several benefits, challenges, and differences in caring for physician-patients versus the general population. When these findings were explored further by quantitative survey, participants noted differences in care regarding chart documentation protocols, communication of results, and accommodation of schedules. They agreed that there were benefits to providing care to physician-patients, such as believing their work was valued and discussing complex issues with greater ease. There also were challenges, including anxiety or self-doubt. Participants also agreed on the following strategies when caring for this population: make recommendations based on evidence-based medicine, follow routine assessment and examination protocols, follow routine scheduling and communication protocols, recommend the same follow-up visit schedule, and define boundaries of the relationship.
Physicians perceive caring for physician-patients as different and rewarding, although some find that it provokes anxiety. Many are willing to make concessions regarding scheduling and testing. With increasing experience, the anxiety decreased as did the need to follow protocols and maintain boundaries. Further investigation is needed to determine the impact of physician experience and training on the quality of care for physician-patients.
医生如何为身为患者的同行(即医生作为患者)提供长期初级护理尚未得到充分研究。为医生患者提供护理的潜在挑战包括维持专业界限和遵循实践指南。目的是探讨在长期护理环境中,医生对照顾医生患者与照顾普通人群中其他患者的认知差异。
该研究包括焦点小组讨论,随后进行定量调查。参与者是一家学术多专科集团诊所的初级护理医生(内科和家庭医学)。焦点小组的主题分析为调查的开展提供了依据。
在焦点小组讨论中,参与者确定了照顾医生患者与照顾普通人群相比的若干益处、挑战和差异。通过定量调查进一步探究这些发现时,参与者指出在病历记录规程、结果沟通和日程安排方面的护理差异。他们一致认为为医生患者提供护理有诸多益处,比如认为自己的工作得到重视,能更轻松地讨论复杂问题。也存在挑战,包括焦虑或自我怀疑。参与者在照顾这一人群时还就以下策略达成一致:基于循证医学提出建议、遵循常规评估和检查规程、遵循常规日程安排和沟通规程、推荐相同的随访日程安排以及界定关系界限。
医生认为照顾医生患者有差异且有意义,尽管有些人发现这会引发焦虑。许多人愿意在日程安排和检查方面做出让步。随着经验增加,焦虑减少,遵循规程和维持界限的需求也减少。需要进一步调查以确定医生经验和培训对医生患者护理质量产生的影响。