Alton Timothy B, Patel Amit R, Bransford Richard J, Bellabarba Carlo, Lee Michael J, Chapman Jens R
Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, 325 9th Ave., Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics, OSS Health, 1855 Powder Mill Rd, York, PA 17402, USA.
Spine J. 2015 Jan 1;15(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
The ideal management of cervical spine epidural abscess (CSEA), medical versus surgical, is controversial. The medical failure rate and neurologic consequences of delayed surgery are not known.
The purpose of this study is to assess the neurologic outcome of patients with CSEA managed medically or with early surgical intervention and to identify the risk factors for medical failure and the consequences of delayed surgery.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) review.
Sixty-two patients with spontaneous CSEA, confirmed with advanced imaging, from a single tertiary medical center from January 5 to September 11.
Patient data were collected from the EMR with motor scores (MS) (American Spinal Injury Association 0-100) recorded pre/posttreatment. Three treatment groups emerged: medical without surgery, early surgery, and those initially managed medically but failed requiring delayed surgery.
Inclusion criteria: spontaneous CSEA based on imaging and intraoperative findings when available, age >18 years, and adequate EMR documentation of the medical decision-making process. Exclusion criteria: postoperative infections, Pott disease, isolated discitis/osteomyelitis, and patients with imaging findings suggestive of CSEA but negative intraoperative findings and cultures.
Of the 62 patients included, 6 were successfully managed medically (Group 1) with MS increase of 2.3 points (standard deviation [SD] 4.4). Thirty-eight patients were treated with early surgery (Group 2) (average time to operating room 24.4 hours [SD 19.2] with average MS increase 11.89 points [SD 19.5]). Eighteen failed medical management (Group 3) requiring delayed surgery (time to OR 7.02 days [SD 5.33]) with a net MS drop of 15.89 (SD 24.9). The medical failure rate was 75%. MS change between early and delayed surgery was significant (p<.001) favoring early surgery. Risk factors and laboratory data did not predict medical failure or posttreatment MS because of the high number of medical failures when abscess involves the cervical epidural space.
Early surgery results in improved posttreatment MS compared with medical failure and delayed surgery. In our patients, the failure rate of medical management was high, 75%. Based on our results, we recommend early surgical decompression for all CSEA.
颈椎硬膜外脓肿(CSEA)的理想治疗方式,即保守治疗与手术治疗,仍存在争议。保守治疗失败率以及延迟手术的神经学后果尚不清楚。
本研究旨在评估接受保守治疗或早期手术干预的CSEA患者的神经学转归,并确定保守治疗失败的危险因素以及延迟手术的后果。
研究设计/研究地点:回顾性电子病历(EMR)审查。
自1月5日至9月11日,来自一家三级医疗中心的62例经先进影像学检查确诊为自发性CSEA的患者。
从EMR中收集患者数据,记录治疗前后的运动评分(MS)(美国脊髓损伤协会0 - 100分)。出现了三个治疗组:保守治疗未手术组、早期手术组以及最初接受保守治疗但失败后需要延迟手术的组。
纳入标准:基于影像学及术中所见(如有)的自发性CSEA、年龄>18岁以及EMR中有充分的医疗决策过程记录。排除标准:术后感染、波特病、孤立性椎间盘炎/骨髓炎以及影像学表现提示CSEA但术中所见及培养结果为阴性的患者。
纳入的62例患者中,6例经保守治疗成功(第1组),MS提高2.3分(标准差[SD]4.4)。38例患者接受早期手术(第2组)(平均至手术室时间24.4小时[SD 19.2],平均MS提高11.89分[SD 19.5])。18例保守治疗失败(第3组),需要延迟手术(至手术室时间7.02天[SD 5.33]),MS净下降15.89(SD 24.9)。保守治疗失败率为75%。早期手术与延迟手术之间的MS变化具有显著差异(p<0.001),支持早期手术。由于脓肿累及颈椎硬膜外间隙时保守治疗失败病例较多,危险因素和实验室数据无法预测保守治疗失败或治疗后的MS。
与保守治疗失败和延迟手术相比,早期手术可改善治疗后的MS。在我们的患者中,保守治疗失败率较高,为75%。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议对所有CSEA患者进行早期手术减压。