Millar S W, Barnes P K, Soni N, Tennant R
Magill Department of Anaesthetics, Westminster Hospital, London.
Br J Anaesth. 1989 Feb;62(2):153-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/62.2.153.
The Magill and Lack anaesthetic breathing systems were compared by measuring inspired and expired carbon dioxide concentrations and expired minute volumes in lightly anaesthetized, unstimulated subjects. There were no significant differences between the two breathing systems at fresh gas flow rates of approximately 50 and 70 ml kg-1 min-1. Inspired carbon dioxide concentrations increased in one of six subjects at the higher fresh gas flow rate using the Magill system and in two using the Lack system. Inspired carbon dioxide concentration did not increase in only one of six subjects at the lower fresh gas flow rate with both systems. Expired carbon dioxide concentrations and expired minute volume increased in the majority of subjects at both fresh gas flow rates using each system. We conclude that a fresh gas flow rate greater than 70 ml kg-1 min-1 (which approximated to alveolar minute volume in our subjects) should be supplied to the Magill and Lack breathing systems.
通过测量轻度麻醉、未受刺激受试者的吸入和呼出二氧化碳浓度以及呼出分钟通气量,对马吉尔(Magill)和拉克(Lack)麻醉呼吸系统进行了比较。在新鲜气体流速约为50和70 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹时,两种呼吸系统之间没有显著差异。在使用马吉尔系统的较高新鲜气体流速下,六名受试者中有一名吸入二氧化碳浓度增加,使用拉克系统的有两名受试者吸入二氧化碳浓度增加。在较低新鲜气体流速下,两种系统的六名受试者中只有一名吸入二氧化碳浓度没有增加。在使用每种系统的两个新鲜气体流速下,大多数受试者的呼出二氧化碳浓度和呼出分钟通气量均增加。我们得出结论,应向马吉尔和拉克呼吸系统供应大于70 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹的新鲜气体流速(这在我们的受试者中近似于肺泡分钟通气量)。