Kaur Jagdish, Rinkoo Arvind Vashishta
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India
Glob Health Promot. 2015 Jun;22(2):71-4. doi: 10.1177/1757975914537322. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
Being the second largest consumer of tobacco in the world and with more than 65% of its population below the age of 35, India would face electronic cigarettes (ECs) as an enormous public health challenge in future. In the absence of established facilities for tobacco cessation in the country, ECs may provide an additional opportunity for the industry to project itself as a harm-reduction crusader. Regulating ECs as tobacco products or as drugs is not a prudent option in the Indian context. Banning ECs seems to be the most plausible approach at present. However, in the long run, India should be open to new research. More significantly, policy makers in India should be wary of the lead time before a ban is implemented-a shorter intervening period could ensure that a well-established, better politically connected and more defiant EC industry, aggressively promoting ECs to Indian youth, never becomes a reality.
作为世界第二大烟草消费国,且其65%以上的人口年龄在35岁以下,印度未来将面临电子烟带来的巨大公共卫生挑战。由于该国缺乏成熟的戒烟设施,电子烟可能会为该行业提供一个额外的机会,使其将自己塑造成一个减少危害的倡导者。在印度的背景下,将电子烟作为烟草制品或药品进行监管并非明智之举。目前,禁止电子烟似乎是最合理的方法。然而,从长远来看,印度应该对新研究持开放态度。更重要的是,印度的政策制定者应该警惕禁令实施前的准备时间——较短的干预期可以确保一个成熟、政治关系更好且更具挑衅性的电子烟行业不会成为现实,这个行业会积极向印度年轻人推广电子烟。