Suppr超能文献

染色体碎裂难以捉摸的证据。

The elusive evidence for chromothripsis.

作者信息

Kinsella Marcus, Patel Anand, Bafna Vineet

机构信息

Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA

出版信息

Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jul;42(13):8231-42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku525. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Abstract

The chromothripsis hypothesis suggests an extraordinary one-step catastrophic genomic event allowing a chromosome to 'shatter into many pieces' and reassemble into a functioning chromosome. Recent efforts have aimed to detect chromothripsis by looking for a genomic signature, characterized by a large number of breakpoints (50-250), but a limited number of oscillating copy number states (2-3) confined to a few chromosomes. The chromothripsis phenomenon has become widely reported in different cancers, but using inconsistent and sometimes relaxed criteria for determining rearrangements occur simultaneously rather than progressively. We revisit the original simulation approach and show that the signature is not clearly exceptional, and can be explained using only progressive rearrangements. For example, 3.9% of progressively simulated chromosomes with 50-55 breakpoints were dominated by two or three copy number states. In addition, by adjusting the parameters of the simulation, the proposed footprint appears more frequently. Lastly, we provide an algorithm to find a sequence of progressive rearrangements that explains all observed breakpoints from a proposed chromothripsis chromosome. Thus, the proposed signature cannot be considered a sufficient proof for this extraordinary hypothesis. Great caution should be exercised when labeling complex rearrangements as chromothripsis from genome hybridization and sequencing experiments.

摘要

染色体碎裂假说提出了一种非同寻常的一步灾难性基因组事件,即允许一条染色体“破碎成许多片段”并重新组装成一条功能正常的染色体。最近的研究致力于通过寻找一种基因组特征来检测染色体碎裂,该特征表现为大量的断点(50 - 250个),但局限于少数几条染色体的拷贝数状态振荡数量有限(2 - 3种)。染色体碎裂现象在不同癌症中已被广泛报道,但在确定重排是同时发生而非逐步发生时,使用的标准不一致,有时甚至较为宽松。我们重新审视了最初的模拟方法,发现该特征并非明显异常,仅通过逐步重排就能解释。例如,在逐步模拟的具有50 - 55个断点的染色体中,3.9%由两到三种拷贝数状态主导。此外,通过调整模拟参数,所提出的特征出现得更为频繁。最后,我们提供了一种算法,用于找到一系列逐步重排,以解释从一条假定的染色体碎裂染色体中观察到的所有断点。因此,所提出的特征不能被视为这一非同寻常假说的充分证据。在根据基因组杂交和测序实验将复杂重排标记为染色体碎裂时应格外谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ded/4117757/bad9f99eae2a/gku525fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验