Suppr超能文献

在急性住院病房使用非典型抗精神病药物的临床经验:以喹硫平为重点。

Clinical experience with atypical antipsychotics in an acute inpatient unit: focus on quetiapine.

机构信息

Delmont Hospital, Box Hill Hospital, Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria and Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2006;10(2):138-41. doi: 10.1080/13651500600579068.

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate dosing and time to efficacy of atypical antipsychotics in an acute inpatient unit. Methods. Admissions during 2001 were reviewed. Patients primarily treated with an atypical antipsychotic (including those simultaneously commenced on a mood stabiliser and/or antidepressant or receiving benzodiazepines) were evaluated. Non-acute patients, those without medical records or transferred to other hospitals were excluded. Medication details were noted. Results. A total of 137 patients were evaluated; 56 (41%) had received risperidone, 38 (28%) olanzapine, and 37 (27%) quetiapine. Mean doses (mg/day) at discharge were risperidone 4.1±2.3, olanzapine 22.5±10.2, quetiapine 576±472. Dose ranges (mg/day) were risperidone 0.5-12, olanzapine 5-40, quetiapine 50-1800. No differences between atypicals in time to efficacy/concomitant anticholinergics/mood stabilisers were observed. Benzodiazepine use was more frequent with risperidone and olanzapine than quetiapine. No serious side effects with any drug were noted. Quetiapine was rapidly titrated in 20 patients (up to 400 mg on Day 1). In 18 of these, acute disturbance was controlled. Two patients were switched for lack of efficacy, one due to persistent tachycardia, and five for concern about early postural hypotension. Conclusion. These data provide further evidence concerning dose and dose range of atypicals required for optimal clinical outcome. More rapid initiation with quetiapine may be of benefit to some patients in the acute inpatient setting.

摘要

目的。评估在急性住院病房使用非典型抗精神病药物的剂量和疗效出现时间。方法。回顾 2001 年的住院患者。主要接受非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患者(包括同时开始使用心境稳定剂和/或抗抑郁药或接受苯二氮䓬类药物的患者)被评估。排除非急性患者、无病历或转院的患者。记录药物详情。结果。共评估了 137 名患者;56 名(41%)接受利培酮,38 名(28%)接受奥氮平,37 名(27%)接受喹硫平。出院时的平均剂量(mg/天)为利培酮 4.1±2.3,奥氮平 22.5±10.2,喹硫平 576±472。剂量范围(mg/天)为利培酮 0.5-12,奥氮平 5-40,喹硫平 50-1800。未观察到非典型药物在疗效出现时间/同时使用抗胆碱能药物/心境稳定剂方面的差异。与喹硫平相比,利培酮和奥氮平的苯二氮䓬类药物使用率更高。未发现任何药物的严重副作用。20 名患者(第 1 天高达 400mg)快速滴定喹硫平。在这 18 名患者中,急性紊乱得到控制。因缺乏疗效有 2 名患者换药,1 名因持续心动过速,5 名因担心早期体位性低血压。结论。这些数据提供了关于获得最佳临床效果所需的非典型药物剂量和剂量范围的进一步证据。在急性住院环境中,更快开始使用喹硫平可能对某些患者有益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验