Soc Stud Sci. 2014 Apr;44(2):165-93. doi: 10.1177/0306312713505003.
Microbial life has been much in the news. From outbreaks of Escherichia coli to discussions of the benefits of raw and fermented foods to recent reports of life forms capable of living in extreme environments, the modest microbe has become a figure for thinking through the presents and possible futures of nature, writ large as well as small. Noting that dominant representations of microbial life have shifted from an idiom of peril to one of promise, we argue that microbes--especially when thriving as microbial communities--are being upheld as model ecosystems in a prescriptive sense, as tokens of how organisms and human ecological relations with them could, should, or might be. We do so in reference to two case studies: the regulatory politics of artisanal cheese and the speculative research of astrobiology. To think of and with microbial communities as model ecosystems offers a corrective to the scientific determinisms we detect in some recent calls to attend to the materiality of scientific objects.
微生物生命一直是新闻热点。从大肠杆菌爆发到对生的和发酵的食物的益处的讨论,再到最近有关能够在极端环境中生存的生命形式的报告,这个不起眼的微生物已经成为一种思考自然的现在和未来的方式,无论是从宏观还是微观的角度来看。我们注意到,对微生物生命的主要描述已经从危险的习语转变为有希望的习语,我们认为,微生物——尤其是当它们作为微生物群落茁壮成长时——被作为规范性意义上的模型生态系统而被推崇,它们是生物体和人类与它们的生态关系的代表,可能会、应该会或者可能会如何。我们这样做是为了参考两个案例研究:手工奶酪的监管政治和天体生物学的推测性研究。将微生物群落视为模型生态系统,可以纠正我们在最近一些呼吁关注科学对象的物质性的呼吁中发现的科学决定论。