Suppr超能文献

腹部CT中既往图像约束压缩感知(PICCS)算法的前瞻性评估:低剂量与标准剂量成像的比较

Prospective evaluation of prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) algorithm in abdominal CT: a comparison of reduced dose with standard dose imaging.

作者信息

Lubner Meghan G, Pickhardt Perry J, Kim David H, Tang Jie, del Rio Alejandro Munoz, Chen Guang-Hong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA,

出版信息

Abdom Imaging. 2015 Jan;40(1):207-21. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0178-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To prospectively study CT dose reduction using the "prior image constrained compressed sensing" (PICCS) reconstruction technique.

METHODS

Immediately following routine standard dose (SD) abdominal MDCT, 50 patients (mean age, 57.7 years; mean BMI, 28.8) underwent a second reduced dose (RD) scan (targeted dose reduction, 70%-90%). DLP, CTDIvol, and SSDE were compared. Several reconstruction algorithms (FBP, ASIR, and PICCS) were applied to the RD series. SD images with FBP served as reference standard. Two blinded readers evaluated each series for subjective image quality and focal lesion detection.

RESULTS

Mean DLP, CTDIvol, and SSDE for RD series were 140.3 mGy cm (median 79.4), 3.7 mGy (median 1.8), and 4.2 mGy (median 2.3) compared with 493.7 mGy cm (median 345.8), 12.9 mGy (median 7.9 mGy), and 14.6 mGy (median 10.1) for SD series, respectively. Mean effective patient diameter was 30.1 cm (median 30), which translates to a mean SSDE reduction of 72% (P < 0.001). RD-PICCS image quality score was 2.8 ± 0.5, improved over the RD-FBP (1.7 ± 0.7) and RD-ASIR (1.9 ± 0.8) (P < 0.001), but lower than SD (3.5 ± 0.5) (P < 0.001). Readers detected 81% (184/228) of focal lesions on RD-PICCS series, vs. 67% (153/228) and 65% (149/228) for RD-FBP and RD-ASIR, respectively. Mean image noise was significantly reduced on RD-PICCS series (13.9 HU) compared with RD-FBP (57.2) and RD-ASIR (44.1) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PICCS allows for marked dose reduction at abdominal CT with improved image quality and diagnostic performance over reduced dose FBP and ASIR. Further study is needed to determine indication-specific dose reduction levels that preserve acceptable diagnostic accuracy relative to higher dose protocols.

摘要

目的

前瞻性研究使用“先验图像约束压缩感知”(PICCS)重建技术降低CT剂量。

方法

50例患者(平均年龄57.7岁;平均BMI 28.8)在进行常规标准剂量(SD)腹部MDCT后,立即接受第二次低剂量(RD)扫描(目标剂量降低70%-90%)。比较剂量长度乘积(DLP)、容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)和大小特异性剂量估计(SSDE)。对RD系列应用了几种重建算法(滤波反投影法(FBP)、自适应统计迭代重建法(ASIR)和PICCS)。采用FBP重建的SD图像作为参考标准。两名盲法阅片者对每个系列的主观图像质量和局灶性病变检测进行评估。

结果

RD系列的平均DLP、CTDIvol和SSDE分别为140.3 mGy·cm(中位数79.4)、3.7 mGy(中位数1.8)和4.2 mGy(中位数2.3),而SD系列分别为493.7 mGy·cm(中位数345.8)、12.9 mGy(中位数7.9 mGy)和14.6 mGy(中位数10.1)。患者平均有效直径为30.1 cm(中位数30),这意味着SSDE平均降低了72%(P < 0.001)。RD-PICCS图像质量评分为2.8±0.5,优于RD-FBP(1.7±0.7)和RD-ASIR(1.9±0.8)(P < 0.001),但低于SD(3.5±0.5)(P < 0.001)。阅片者在RD-PICCS系列上检测到81%(184/228)的局灶性病变,而RD-FBP和RD-ASIR分别为67%(153/228)和65%(149/228)。与RD-FBP(57.2)和RD-ASIR(44.1)相比,RD-PICCS系列的平均图像噪声显著降低(13.9 HU)(P < 0.001)。

结论

PICCS可在腹部CT中显著降低剂量,与低剂量FBP和ASIR相比,图像质量和诊断性能有所提高。需要进一步研究以确定特定适应症的剂量降低水平,相对于高剂量方案,该水平能保持可接受的诊断准确性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验