• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切除与否:MelaFind对德国皮肤科医生对非典型病变进行活检决策的影响。

To excise or not: impact of MelaFind on German dermatologists' decisions to biopsy atypical lesions.

作者信息

Hauschild Axel, Chen Suephy C, Weichenthal Michael, Blum Andreas, King Hadley C, Goldsmith Jeff, Scharfstein Daniel, Gutkowicz-Krusin Dina

机构信息

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Jul;12(7):606-14. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12362. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1111/ddg.12362
PMID:24944011
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the biopsy sensitivity to melanoma of dermatologists in Germany and the impact of MelaFind® on their decisions to biopsy melanomas.

DESIGN

Randomized two-armed online reader study presenting case information, clinical/dermatoscopic images of pigmented skin lesions and MelaFind results (Arm 2).

METHODS

Each participant was asked to review 130 pigmented skin lesions. Biopsy decisions of dermatologists without MelaFind versus MelaFind and dermatologists without MelaFind versus dermatologists with MelaFind were compared.

RESULTS

Dermatologists without MelaFind had average sensitivity to melanoma of 69.5 % and average specificity of 55.9 %. MelaFind had greater sensitivity than dermatologists alone (96.9 % vs. 69.5 %, one-sided p < 0.00001) and lower specificity (9.2 % vs. 55.9 %, one-sided p < 0.00001). Dermatologists with MelaFind had higher sensitivity than those without MelaFind (78 % vs. 69.5 %, one-sided p < 0.00001) and a lower specificity (45.8 % vs. 55.9 %, one-sided p < 0.00001). The number of dermatologists detecting over 90 % of melanomas increased from 3 of 101 without MelaFind to 22 of 101 with MelaFind (p = 0.00006) while specificity remained relatively equivalent (23 % vs. 21 %, p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The MelaFind information, when incorporated into the final biopsy decision, can improve biopsy sensitivity with modest effect on biopsy specificity.

摘要

目的

确定德国皮肤科医生对黑色素瘤活检的敏感性,以及MelaFind®对他们活检黑色素瘤决策的影响。

设计

随机双臂在线读者研究,呈现病例信息、色素沉着性皮肤病变的临床/皮肤镜图像以及MelaFind结果(第二组)。

方法

要求每位参与者查看130个色素沉着性皮肤病变。比较了未使用MelaFind的皮肤科医生与使用MelaFind的皮肤科医生的活检决策,以及未使用MelaFind的皮肤科医生之间的活检决策。

结果

未使用MelaFind的皮肤科医生对黑色素瘤的平均敏感性为69.5%,平均特异性为55.9%。MelaFind的敏感性高于单独的皮肤科医生(96.9%对69.5%,单侧p<0.00001),特异性较低(9.2%对55.9%,单侧p<0.00001)。使用MelaFind的皮肤科医生比未使用MelaFind的皮肤科医生具有更高的敏感性(78%对69.5%,单侧p<0.00001)和更低的特异性(45.8%对55.9%,单侧p<0.00001)。检测出超过90%黑色素瘤的皮肤科医生数量从101名未使用MelaFind的医生中的3名增加到101名使用MelaFind的医生中的22名(p = 0.00006),而特异性保持相对相当(23%对21%,p = 0.99)。

结论

将MelaFind信息纳入最终活检决策时,可提高活检敏感性,对活检特异性影响不大。

相似文献

1
To excise or not: impact of MelaFind on German dermatologists' decisions to biopsy atypical lesions.切除与否:MelaFind对德国皮肤科医生对非典型病变进行活检决策的影响。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Jul;12(7):606-14. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12362. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
2
Diagnostic performance of the MelaFind device in a real-life clinical setting.MelaFind设备在实际临床环境中的诊断性能。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2017 Apr;15(4):414-419. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13220. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
Digital dermoscopy in clinical practise: a three-centre analysis.临床实践中的数字皮肤镜检查:一项三中心分析。
Skin Res Technol. 2007 May;13(2):133-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00219.x.
4
The impact of dermoscopy on the management of pigmented lesions in everyday clinical practice of general dermatologists: a prospective study.皮肤镜检查对皮肤科医生日常临床实践中色素性皮损处理的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar;162(3):563-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09551.x. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
5
The diagnostic performance of expert dermoscopists vs a computer-vision system on small-diameter melanomas.专家皮肤镜医师与计算机视觉系统对小直径黑色素瘤的诊断性能比较。
Arch Dermatol. 2008 Apr;144(4):476-82. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.4.476.
6
Detection of melanoma from dermoscopic images of naevi acquired under uncontrolled conditions.对在非控制条件下采集的痣的皮肤镜图像进行黑素瘤检测。
Skin Res Technol. 2010 Feb;16(1):85-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00385.x.
7
Availability of digital dermoscopy in daily practice dramatically reduces the number of excised melanocytic lesions: results from an observational study.日常实践中数字皮肤镜的应用大大减少了切除的黑素细胞病变数量:一项观察性研究的结果。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Oct;167(4):778-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11042.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
8
The diagnostic evaluation of MelaFind multi-spectral objective computer vision system.MelaFind多光谱客观计算机视觉系统的诊断评估。
Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2013 Jul;7(4):405-11. doi: 10.1517/17530059.2013.785520. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
9
Utility of a Noninvasive 2-Gene Molecular Assay for Cutaneous Melanoma and Effect on the Decision to Biopsy.一种用于皮肤黑色素瘤的非侵入性双基因分子检测的效用及其对活检决策的影响。
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jul 1;153(7):675-680. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0473.
10
Pigmented Skin Lesion Biopsies After Computer-Aided Multispectral Digital Skin Lesion Analysis.计算机辅助多光谱数字皮肤病变分析后的色素性皮肤病变活检
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Nov;115(11):666-9. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.137.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Novel Optical Imaging Techniques for Melanoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于黑色素瘤检测的新型光学成像技术的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Dermatol. 2025 Oct;64(10):1813-1824. doi: 10.1111/ijd.17828. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
Issues in Melanoma Detection: Semisupervised Deep Learning Algorithm Development via a Combination of Human and Artificial Intelligence.黑色素瘤检测中的问题:通过结合人类和人工智能开发半监督深度学习算法
JMIR Dermatol. 2022 Dec 12;5(4):e39113. doi: 10.2196/39113.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Challenges and Perspectives.
皮肤科中的人工智能:挑战与展望
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;12(12):2637-2651. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00833-8. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
4
Artificial Intelligence and Its Effect on Dermatologists' Accuracy in Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification: Web-Based Survey Study.人工智能及其对皮肤科医生在皮肤镜黑色素瘤图像分类中准确性的影响:基于网络的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 11;22(9):e18091. doi: 10.2196/18091.
5
A roadmap for the clinical implementation of optical-imaging biomarkers.光学成像生物标志物临床应用的路线图。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2019 May;3(5):339-353. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0392-5. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.用于诊断成人皮肤癌的计算机辅助诊断技术(基于皮肤镜检查和光谱学)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013186.
7
Optical coherence tomography for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.光学相干断层扫描技术在成人皮肤癌诊断中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013189. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013189.
8
Exfoliative cytology for diagnosing basal cell carcinoma and other skin cancers in adults.用于诊断成人基底细胞癌和其他皮肤癌的脱落细胞学检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013187.
9
Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.单独或联合使用视诊和皮肤镜检查诊断成人角质形成细胞皮肤癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD011901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011901.pub2.
10
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.成人角质形成细胞皮肤癌诊断中的反射式共聚焦显微镜检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013191. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013191.