Milone M, Di Minno M N, Maietta P, Shatalova O, Musella M, Milone F
Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy -
Int Angiol. 2015 Jun;34(3):238-42. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Although saphenous nerve (SN) injury represents a complication of great saphenous vein (GSV) stripping, little is know about the techniques to minimize the risk of nerve injury. This is still controversial if the stripping direction could be related to the incidence of nerve injury.
A prospective comparative study to compare upwards and downwards total GSV stripping during saphenectomy with regard to the occurrence of postoperative SN injury has been designed. Electroneurogram measurement and clinical identification of nerve injury have been performed 1 day before surgery, 1 week, 12 weeks and 1 year after surgery.
Although clinical evaluation of nerve injury was found to be similar among upwards and downwards stripping both at one and 12 weeks after surgery, ENG measurement showed a higher incidence of lesions after the downwards stripping both at one and 12 weeks after surgery. No clinical or ENG findings of nerve injury was found 1 year after surgery.
Upwards method is less traumatic than downwards total GSV stripping in terms of incidence of SN injury, as confirmed by electrophysiological nerve studies.
尽管隐神经(SN)损伤是大隐静脉(GSV)剥脱术的一种并发症,但对于将神经损伤风险降至最低的技术却知之甚少。剥脱方向是否与神经损伤发生率相关仍存在争议。
设计了一项前瞻性对照研究,比较大隐静脉切除术中大隐静脉向上和向下完全剥脱术后隐神经损伤的发生情况。在手术前1天、术后1周、12周和1年进行神经电图测量和神经损伤的临床鉴定。
尽管术后1周和12周时,向上和向下剥脱的神经损伤临床评估结果相似,但神经电图测量显示,术后1周和12周时向下剥脱后的损伤发生率更高。术后1年未发现神经损伤的临床或神经电图表现。
电生理神经研究证实,就隐神经损伤发生率而言,向上剥脱法比向下大隐静脉完全剥脱法的创伤性更小。