Watabe Taichi, Abe Haruhiko, Kohno Ritsuko, Oginosawa Yasushi, Hayashi Katsuhide, Ohe Hisaharu, Tamura Masahito, Takeuchi Masaaki, Otsuji Yutaka
Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1224-31. doi: 10.1111/jce.12476. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
Unnecessary ventricular pacing in sinus node disease (SND) must be avoided. To test the hypothesis that in SND, with or without 1st degree atrioventricular (AV) block, cumulative percent ventricular pacing (cum%VP) can be limited by low right atrial septal (LRAS) instead of right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing.
We studied 102 dual-chamber pacemaker recipients with SND. The PQ interval on 12-lead electrocardiogram and the atrial paced to ventricular sensed interval (Ap-Vs) during LRAS and RAA pacing were measured and compared at implantation, 3 months and 1 year of follow-up. Group 1 included 62 patients with baseline PQ interval <200 milliseconds during LRAS (n = 28) versus RAA (n = 34) pacing. Group 2 included 40 patients with baseline PQ ≥200 milliseconds during LRAS (n = 20) versus RAA (n = 20) pacing. cum%VP were measured at 3 months and 1 year.
The characteristics and AV conduction properties were similar and the Ap-Vs interval was significantly shorter in the LRAS than in the RAA pacing group up to 1 year (193 ± 32 milliseconds vs. 220 ± 27 milliseconds in Group 1; P = 0.003, 222 ± 41 milliseconds vs. 281 ± 30 milliseconds in Group 2; P < 0.001). While cumulative percent atrial pacing was consistently similar, cum%VP was significantly smaller during LRAS than RAA pacing (1 ± 1% vs. 8 ± 18% in Group 1; P = 0.03, 7 ± 10% vs. 48 ± 38% in Group 2; P < 0.001). Similar observations were made with or without left atrial (LA) enlargement.
Compared with RAA, LRAS pacing showed shorter AV interval in SND patients with or without 1st degree AV block and LA enlargement. This beneficial effect persisted through 1-year follow-up, and decreased cum%VP significantly.
必须避免在窦房结疾病(SND)中进行不必要的心室起搏。为了验证以下假设:在SND患者中,无论有无一度房室(AV)阻滞,低位右心房间隔(LRAS)起搏而非右心耳(RAA)起搏可限制累积心室起搏百分比(cum%VP)。
我们研究了102例植入双腔起搏器的SND患者。在植入时、随访3个月和1年时,测量并比较12导联心电图上的PQ间期以及LRAS和RAA起搏期间的心房起搏至心室感知间期(Ap-Vs)。第1组包括62例患者,在LRAS起搏(n = 28)与RAA起搏(n = 34)期间基线PQ间期<200毫秒。第2组包括40例患者,在LRAS起搏(n = 20)与RAA起搏(n = 20)期间基线PQ≥200毫秒。在3个月和1年时测量cum%VP。
两组患者的特征和房室传导特性相似,直至1年时,LRAS起搏组的Ap-Vs间期显著短于RAA起搏组(第1组为193±32毫秒 vs. 220±27毫秒;P = 0.003,第2组为222±41毫秒 vs. 281±30毫秒;P < 0.001)。虽然累积心房起搏百分比始终相似,但LRAS起搏期间的cum%VP显著小于RAA起搏(第1组为1±1% vs. 8±18%;P = 0.03,第2组为7±10% vs. 48±38%;P < 0.001)。无论有无左心房(LA)扩大,均观察到类似结果。
与RAA相比,LRAS起搏在有或无一度AV阻滞及LA扩大的SND患者中显示出更短的房室间期。这种有益效果在1年随访期间持续存在,并显著降低了cum%VP。