• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非三级新生儿病房的鼻持续气道正压通气治疗:减少向上转诊需求。

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in a non-tertiary neonatal unit: reduced need for up-transfers.

作者信息

Kiran Sai, Murki Srinivas, Pratap Oleti Tejo, Kandraju Hemasree, Reddy Anupama

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500029, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pediatr. 2015 Feb;82(2):126-30. doi: 10.1007/s12098-014-1484-6. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1007/s12098-014-1484-6
PMID:24946945
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the need for up-transfer after starting of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (n-CPAP) services in a Level II special newborn care unit (SNCU).

METHODS

Five hundred fifty infants admitted to Level II SNCU, 252 infants during one year prior to introduction of n-CPAP (retrospective data from case records and electronic data base) and 298 infants during one year after introduction of n-CPAP services (prospective data in predefined case reporting form) were evaluated in this before and after intervention trial. The primary outcome was proportion of infants needing up-transfers from Level II SNCU for any indication.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic data like birth weight, gestation and other perinatal factors were similar between the two epochs. Among the infants admitted to Level II SNCU, up-transfer for any reason was significantly higher in the pre-CPAP epoch compared with CPAP epoch (n = 93, 36 % vs. n = 74, 24.8 %, p = 0.002, OR 0.56, 95 % CI 0.38 to 0.83). However parent desired up-transfers were similar between the two epochs (n = 9, 3 % vs. n = 16, 5 %, p = 0.40). Introduction of n-CPAP treatment modality reduced up-transfers in subgroups of very low birth weight infants (VLBW) (n = 20, 74 % vs. n = 15, 37 %, p = 0.003) and also in preterm infants (n = 50, 54 % vs. n = 34, 32 %, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of n-CPAP services in a non-tertiary care neonatal unit, significantly reduced the need for up-transfers, especially in VLBW and preterm infants.

摘要

目的

评估在二级特殊新生儿护理病房(SNCU)启动鼻持续气道正压通气(n-CPAP)服务后向上转诊的必要性。

方法

在这项干预前后的试验中,对550名入住二级SNCU的婴儿进行了评估,其中252名婴儿是在引入n-CPAP前一年(来自病例记录和电子数据库的回顾性数据),298名婴儿是在引入n-CPAP服务后一年(以预定义病例报告表形式收集的前瞻性数据)。主要结局是因任何指征需要从二级SNCU向上转诊的婴儿比例。

结果

两个时期的基线人口统计学数据,如出生体重、孕周和其他围产期因素相似。在入住二级SNCU的婴儿中,与CPAP时期相比,CPAP前时期因任何原因向上转诊的比例显著更高(n = 93,36% 对 n = 74,24.8%,p = 0.002,OR 0.56,95% CI 0.38至0.83)。然而,两个时期家长要求的向上转诊情况相似(n = 9,3% 对 n = 16,5%,p = 0.40)。引入n-CPAP治疗方式降低了极低出生体重儿(VLBW)亚组(n = 20,74% 对 n = 15,37%,p = 0.003)以及早产儿亚组(n = 50,54% 对 n = 34,32%,p = 0.002)的向上转诊率。

结论

在非三级护理新生儿病房引入n-CPAP服务,显著降低了向上转诊的必要性,尤其是在极低出生体重儿和早产儿中。

相似文献

1
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in a non-tertiary neonatal unit: reduced need for up-transfers.非三级新生儿病房的鼻持续气道正压通气治疗:减少向上转诊需求。
Indian J Pediatr. 2015 Feb;82(2):126-30. doi: 10.1007/s12098-014-1484-6. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
2
Bubble vs conventional continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in preterm very low birth weight infants: a pilot study.气泡与常规持续气道正压通气预防早产儿极低出生体重儿拔管失败的比较:一项初步研究。
Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1163-8. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0651-2. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
3
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高流量鼻导管与经鼻持续气道正压通气用于呼吸窘迫早产儿的初始呼吸支持:一项随机对照试验
Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Randomized controlled trial of two methods of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (N-CPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: underwater bubbly CPAP vs. Medijet system device.两种鼻持续气道正压通气(N-CPAP)方法用于呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验:水下气泡式CPAP与Medijet系统设备对比
Turk J Pediatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;54(6):632-40.
5
Nasal bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm infants ≤32 weeks: A retrospective cohort study.32周及以下早产儿鼻双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)与鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2016 May;52(5):493-8. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13175.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Barrier Dressing to Reduce Nasal Injury in Preterm Infants Receiving Binasal Noninvasive Respiratory Support.一项用于减少接受双鼻无创呼吸支持的早产儿鼻损伤的屏障敷料的随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 2018 Oct;201:34-39.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
7
Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Weaning from Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.加热湿化高流量鼻导管在早产儿撤离持续气道正压通气中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Neonatology. 2016;110(3):204-9. doi: 10.1159/000446063. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Nasal Jet-CPAP (variable flow) versus Bubble-CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress: an open label, randomized controlled trial.鼻喷气式持续气道正压通气(可变流量)与气泡式持续气道正压通气治疗呼吸窘迫早产儿的比较:一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2015 Nov;35(11):935-40. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.98. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
9
Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants-"The OPTTIMMAL-Trial"-Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.两种不同鼻塞持续气道正压通气水平治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的应用-"OPTIMMAL 试验"-优化未成熟肺的呼气末正压:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Oct 1;21(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04660-0.
10
Comparison of three non-invasive ventilation strategies (NSIPPV/BiPAP/NCPAP) for RDS in VLBW infants.三种无创通气策略(鼻间歇正压通气/双水平气道正压通气/鼻塞持续气道正压通气)用于极低出生体重儿呼吸窘迫综合征的比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Nov;31(21):2832-2838. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1357693. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of early continuous positive airway pressure in the delivery room (DR-CPAP) on neonates < 1500 g in a low-resource setting: a protocol for a pilot feasibility and acceptability randomized controlled trial.低资源环境下产房早期持续气道正压通气(DR-CPAP)对体重<1500克新生儿的影响:一项初步可行性和可接受性随机对照试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Oct 4;10(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01552-x.
2
Management of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome in resource-limited settings.资源有限环境下新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的管理。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2024 May 22;66(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/safp.v66i1.5938.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome of intubate surfactant rapidly extubate (InSuRE): an Indian experience.气管插管后快速拔管使用表面活性剂(InSuRE)的结果:印度的经验
Indian J Pediatr. 2014 Jan;81(1):20-3. doi: 10.1007/s12098-013-1090-z. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
2
Continuous positive airway pressure for spontaneously breathing premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome.经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的自主呼吸。
Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1185-91. doi: 10.1007/s12098-012-0722-z. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
3
Bubble vs conventional continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in preterm very low birth weight infants: a pilot study.
Availability and use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for neonatal care in public health facilities in India: a cross-sectional cluster survey.
印度公共卫生设施中新生儿持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的供应和使用情况:一项横断面聚类调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 28;10(2):e031128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031128.
4
Reducing preterm mortality in eastern Uganda: the impact of introducing low-cost bubble CPAP on neonates <1500 g.在乌干达东部降低早产儿死亡率:引进低成本气泡 CPAP 对 <1500g 新生儿的影响。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Sep 4;19(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1698-x.
5
Healthcare workers' views on the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in neonates: a qualitative study in Andhra Pradesh, India.医护人员对新生儿使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的看法:印度安得拉邦的一项定性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1311-8.
6
Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Infants With Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气对胎粪吸入综合征婴儿的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Feb 1;172(2):161-165. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3873.
7
Nasal masks or binasal prongs for delivering continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates-a randomised trial.用于为早产儿提供持续气道正压通气的鼻罩或双鼻导管——一项随机试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;176(3):379-386. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2851-x. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
Continuous positive airway pressure in neonates.
Indian J Pediatr. 2015 Feb;82(2):107-8. doi: 10.1007/s12098-014-1651-9. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
气泡与常规持续气道正压通气预防早产儿极低出生体重儿拔管失败的比较:一项初步研究。
Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1163-8. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0651-2. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
4
Assessment of special care newborn units in India.印度新生儿重症监护病房评估
J Health Popul Nutr. 2011 Oct;29(5):500-9. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i5.8904.
5
Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants ventilated with continuous positive airway pressure vs. mechanical ventilation.极低出生体重儿应用持续气道正压通气与机械通气的神经发育结局比较。
Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Feb;79(2):218-23. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0535-5. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
6
Bubble CPAP for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.气泡 CPAP 治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征。
Indian Pediatr. 2010 Feb;47(2):139-43. doi: 10.1007/s13312-010-0021-6. Epub 2009 May 20.
7
Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants.极早产儿出生时采用鼻持续气道正压通气(Nasal CPAP)或插管。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):700-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072788.
8
Continuous positive airway pressure therapy for infants with respiratory distress in non tertiary care centers: a randomized, controlled trial.非三级护理中心对呼吸窘迫婴儿进行持续气道正压通气治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):509-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0775.
9
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and gram-negative sepsis in low-birthweight infants.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Jul;25(7):663-4; author reply 664. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000220206.96733.ca.
10
Validation of the National Institutes of Health consensus definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.美国国立卫生研究院支气管肺发育不良共识定义的验证
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1353-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0249.