Suppr超能文献

经鼻持续气道正压通气对胎粪吸入综合征婴儿的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Infants With Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Vijay Marie Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Feb 1;172(2):161-165. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3873.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) as a primary respiratory therapy in meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) has not been studied extensively. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure, when applied in newborns with MAS, may resolve atelectasis by sufficiently expanding partially obstructed small airways and stabilizing the collapsing terminal airways to enhance oxygen exchange.

OBJECTIVE

To compare NCPAP vs standard care in neonates with moderate to severe respiratory failure due to MAS in reducing the need for invasive ventilation.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter open-label, parallel-group (1:1 ratio) randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 5, 2014, to May 26, 2016. Data were collected from 3 tertiary care neonatal intensive care units. All infants admitted with respiratory distress, defined as Downe score greater than 4 and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation less than 90%, were assessed for study eligibility if the chest radiograph was suggestive of MAS and they met the other inclusion criteria: gestation longer than 35 weeks, a birth weight greater than 2000 g, and born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

INTERVENTIONS

Infants were randomly assigned to either NCPAP or standard care (5-10 L/min hood oxygen).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of life.

RESULTS

After excluding 14 infants, 67 infants were randomized to bubble NCPAP and 68 infants to standard care. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Infants randomized to the bubble NCPAP group needed mechanical ventilation less frequently in the first 7 days of life compared with standard care (2 [3.0%] vs 17 [25.0%]); odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.43; P = .002). The need for surfactant (3 [4.5%] vs 11 [16.2%]; odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-0.87) and culture-positive sepsis (4 [6.0%] vs 13 [19.0%]; odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.93) were higher in the standard care group. There was an increased duration of oxygen therapy (median [interquartile range], 45.5 [28.0-78.3] vs 26 [20.0-48.0] hours; P = .001) in the standard care group. In the NCPAP group vs standard care group, incidence of persistent pulmonary hypertension (9 [13%] vs 19 [28%]; odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-1.01) and duration of hospital stay (median [interquartile range], 5.0 [4.0-8.8] vs 4.0 [4.0-6.0] days; P = .14) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Bubble NCPAP in comparison with standard care for infants with MAS reduces the need for mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry, India Identifier: CTRI/2015/03/005631.

摘要

重要性

鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)作为胎粪吸入综合征(MAS)的主要呼吸治疗方法尚未得到广泛研究。在患有 MAS 的新生儿中应用 NCPAP 可能通过充分扩张部分阻塞的小气道并稳定塌陷的终末气道来解决肺不张,从而增强氧交换。

目的

比较 NCPAP 与 MAS 导致的中重度呼吸衰竭新生儿的标准护理,以减少有创通气的需求。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多中心、开放标签、平行组(1:1 比例)随机临床试验,于 2014 年 8 月 5 日至 2016 年 5 月 26 日进行。数据来自 3 个三级新生儿重症监护病房。所有因呼吸窘迫入院的婴儿,定义为 Downe 评分大于 4 分和外周毛细血管血氧饱和度小于 90%,如果胸片提示 MAS 且符合其他纳入标准,则评估研究的纳入标准:胎龄大于 35 周,出生体重大于 2000 g,胎粪污染羊水分娩。

干预措施

婴儿随机分配接受 NCPAP 或标准护理(5-10 L/min 罩吸氧)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是出生后 7 天内机械通气的需求。

结果

排除 14 名婴儿后,67 名婴儿被随机分配至气泡 NCPAP 组,68 名婴儿被随机分配至标准护理组。两组的基线特征相似。与标准护理组相比,气泡 NCPAP 组在出生后 7 天内需要机械通气的频率较低(2[3.0%]比 17[25.0%]);比值比,0.09;95%CI,0.02-0.43;P=0.002)。标准护理组需要表面活性剂(3[4.5%]比 11[16.2%])和培养阳性败血症(4[6.0%]比 13[19.0%])的可能性更高;比值比,0.24;95%CI,0.05-0.87)。与标准护理组相比,标准护理组的氧疗时间更长(中位数[四分位数范围],45.5[28.0-78.3]比 26[20.0-48.0]小时;P=0.001)。与标准护理组相比,NCPAP 组持续性肺动脉高压(9[13%]比 19[28%])和住院时间(中位数[四分位数范围],5.0[4.0-8.8]比 4.0[4.0-6.0]天)的发生率相似;比值比,0.42;95%CI,0.17-1.01)。

结论和相关性

与 MAS 婴儿的标准护理相比,气泡 NCPAP 可减少出生后 7 天内机械通气的需求。

试验注册

印度临床试验注册中心,标识符:CTRI/2015/03/005631。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies in Neonates.新生儿无创通气策略
Indian Pediatr. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s13312-025-00077-7.
3
Meconium aspiration syndrome: from pathophysiology to treatment.胎粪吸入综合征:从病理生理学到治疗
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Feb 15;86(4):2023-2031. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001835. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Non-invasive ventilation in neonates: a review of current literature.新生儿无创通气:当前文献综述
Front Pediatr. 2023 Nov 28;11:1248836. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1248836. eCollection 2023.
5
Meconium aspiration syndrome: a comprehensive review.胎粪吸入综合征:全面综述。
J Perinatol. 2023 Oct;43(10):1211-1221. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01708-2. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
9
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Narrative Review.胎粪吸入综合征:一篇叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;8(3):230. doi: 10.3390/children8030230.
10
Effects of melatonin on protecting against lung injury (Review).褪黑素对预防肺损伤的作用(综述)。
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Mar;21(3):228. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9659. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Current status of neonatal intensive care in India.印度新生儿重症监护的现状。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 May;101(3):F260-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308169. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
2
Neonatal mechanical ventilation: Indications and outcome.新生儿机械通气:适应证与预后
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;19(9):523-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.164800.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验