Patil Vijay Maruti, Noronha Vanita, Joshi Amit, Muddu Vamshi Krishna, Dhumal Sachin, Arya Supreeta, Juvekar Shashikant, Pai P, Chatturvedi Pankaj, Devendra Arvind Chaukar, Ghosh Sarbani, D'cruz Anil, Kumar Prabhash
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Cancer. 2014 Jan-Mar;51(1):20-4. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.134608.
To study the safety and efficacy of weekly chemotherapy as part of induction chemotherapy, in locally advanced head and neck cancer for patients, who are unfit for upfront radical treatment.
It is a retrospective analysis of on-use weekly chemotherapy as Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer, who are technically unresectable are unfit for upfront radical treatment. Induction chemotherapy given was a 2 drug combination of paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 ) and carboplatin AUC 2. The decision to give weekly induction chemotherapy was given on the basis of presence of 2 more following features: Poor performance status (ECOG PS 2-3), presence of uncontrolled co morbidities, BMI below 18.5 kg/m 2 and age more than 60 years. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS version 16.0) was used for analysis. The response rates, toxicity (accordance with CTCAE vs. 4.02), completion rate (Cp) of radical intent treatment post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are reported.
Fifteen patients were considered for such therapy. Fourteen out of fifteen patients completed NACT. The median numbers of planned weekly cycles were 6 (3-8). Response (CR + PR) was seen in 10 patients. Overall grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 6 patients. No toxicity related mortality was noted. The calculated completion rate (Cp) of radical intent treatment post NACT was 46.7%. The median PFS and OS were 10.36 months (95% CI 6.73-14.00 months) and 16.53 months (95% CI 4.22-28.84).
Use of induction chemotherapy with weekly regimen is safe and effective selected cohort of patients with locally advanced disease who are unfit for upfront radical treatment.
研究每周化疗作为诱导化疗的一部分,对于不适合进行 upfront 根治性治疗的局部晚期头颈癌患者的安全性和有效性。
这是一项回顾性分析,研究对象为在局部晚期头颈癌中使用每周化疗作为诱导化疗的患者,这些患者在技术上无法切除且不适合 upfront 根治性治疗。给予的诱导化疗为紫杉醇(80mg/m²)和卡铂AUC 2的两药联合方案。基于以下两个或更多特征决定给予每周诱导化疗:体能状态差(东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分2 - 3)、存在未控制的合并症、体重指数低于18.5kg/m²以及年龄超过60岁。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS版本16.0)进行分析。报告了缓解率、毒性(根据美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准第4.02版)、新辅助化疗后根治性治疗的完成率(Cp)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
15名患者接受了此类治疗。15名患者中有14名完成了新辅助化疗。计划的每周周期中位数为6(3 - 8)。10名患者出现缓解(完全缓解 + 部分缓解)。6名患者出现3 - 4级总体毒性。未观察到与毒性相关的死亡。新辅助化疗后根治性治疗的计算完成率(Cp)为46.7%。PFS和OS的中位数分别为10.36个月(95%置信区间6.73 - 14.00个月)和16.53个月(95%置信区间4.22 - 28.84)。
对于不适合 upfront 根治性治疗的局部晚期疾病患者,采用每周方案的诱导化疗是安全有效的。