From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (R.P.G., C.T.R., S.D.W., C.L., N.D., S.A.M., L.T.G., E.M.A., E.B.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (N.S.R., S.S.); Biostatistics, Quintiles, Inc, Durham, NC (J.M.B.); and Daiichi Sankyo, Inc, Pharma Development, Edison, NJ (A.D., J.D., M.S., M.M.).
Stroke. 2014 Aug;45(8):2372-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006025. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
The once-daily oral factor Xa inhibitor, edoxaban, is as effective as warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism while decreasing bleeding in a phase III trial of patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate-high stroke risk. Limited data regarding cerebrovascular events with edoxaban were reported previously.
We analyzed the subtypes of cerebrovascular events in 21 105 patients participating in Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) comparing outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin versus 2 edoxaban regimens (high dose, low dose). The primary end point for this prespecified analysis of cerebrovascular events was all stroke (ischemic plus hemorrhagic), defined as an abrupt onset of focal neurological deficit because of infarction or bleeding with symptoms lasting ≥24 hours or fatal in <24 hours. Independent stroke neurologists unaware of treatment adjudicated all cerebrovascular events.
Patients randomized to high-dose edoxaban had fewer strokes on-treatment (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.98) than warfarin (median time-in-therapeutic range, 68.4%); patients in the low-dose edoxaban group had similar rates (hazard ratio, 1.10 versus warfarin; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.32). Rates of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack were similar with high-dose edoxaban (1.76% per year) and warfarin (1.73% per year; P=0.81), but more frequent with low-dose edoxaban (2.48% per year; P<0.001). Both edoxaban regimens significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke and other subtypes of intracranial bleeds.
In patients with atrial fibrillation, once-daily edoxaban was as effective as warfarin in preventing all strokes, with significant reductions in various subtypes of intracranial bleeding. Ischemic cerebrovascular event rates were similar with high-dose edoxaban and warfarin, whereas low-dose edoxaban was less effective than warfarin.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.
在一项 III 期临床试验中,对于中高危卒中风险的房颤患者,每日一次口服因子 Xa 抑制剂依度沙班在预防卒中和全身性栓塞方面与华法林同样有效,同时降低出血风险。此前曾有报道依度沙班治疗相关的脑血管事件的有限数据。
我们分析了 21105 例接受有效抗凝治疗的房颤患者的亚组(房颤血栓栓塞预防 - 心肌梗死 48 期试验),依度沙班组别包括华法林组及两种依度沙班剂量(高剂量、低剂量)组。该脑血管事件的预设分析的主要终点为所有卒种(缺血性卒中和出血性卒种),定义为局灶性神经功能缺损的突然发作,由于梗死或出血引起,症状持续时间≥24 小时或 24 小时内死亡。不知道治疗分组的独立卒中神经病学家对所有的脑血管事件进行裁决。
与华法林相比,高剂量依度沙班治疗组患者的卒种更少(风险比,0.80;95%置信区间,0.65-0.98)(治疗范围内时间中位数,68.4%);低剂量依度沙班组患者的发生率相似(风险比,1.10 与华法林相比;95%置信区间,0.91-1.32)。高剂量依度沙班(每年 1.76%)和华法林(每年 1.73%)的缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作发生率相似(P=0.81),但低剂量依度沙班(每年 2.48%)发生率更高(P<0.001)。两种依度沙班方案均显著降低了出血性卒中和其他颅内出血亚型。
在房颤患者中,每日一次依度沙班与华法林预防所有卒种同样有效,且颅内出血各种亚型均显著减少。高剂量依度沙班与华法林的缺血性脑血管事件发生率相似,而低剂量依度沙班的效果不如华法林。