Juhl Caroline S, Hansen Estrid S, Høgdall Claus K, Ørtoft Gitte
c/o Gitte Ørtoft, Brendstrupgårdsvej 100, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Dan Med J. 2014 Jun;61(6):A4864.
It is a comparative register study designed for data validation of surgery, pathology and recurrence for endometrial cancer in the Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database (DGCD) in the 2005-2009 period. The main outcomes were completeness of the data registered in the DGCD, agreement concerning data reported and comparability between the DGCD and a definite reference.
DGCD data on women with endometrial cancer or adenomatous hyperplasia supplemented with patient charts for data on recurrence were retrieved and compared with a definite reference (the pathology report and clinical journals).
The completeness of data on pathology and surgery reported to the DGCD was 97.3%. The comparability between the DGCG and the definite reference was 94.4%. The agreement for the reported data in the DGCD was 88.3%. For recurrence, the comparability was 94.5% and the agreement was 71.6%. Completeness could not be determined due to the design of the database, where recurrence is composed of optional variables only.
The data on endometrial cancer registered in the DGCD regarding surgery and pathology are valid and complete, and they provide a solid base for research. Due to the relatively infrequent incidence of recurrences, and the fact that these are rarely entered into the database when they do occur, agreement concerning recurrence is low. Based on this study, the DGCD cannot alone provide information on recurrence that will give a reliable foundation for research.
Funding was provided by the Health Research Fund of the Region of Central Jutland and the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital.
not relevant.
这是一项比较登记研究，旨在对丹麦妇科癌症数据库（DGCD）2005 - 2009年期间子宫内膜癌的手术、病理和复发数据进行验证。主要结果是DGCD中登记数据的完整性、所报告数据的一致性以及DGCD与明确参考数据之间的可比性。
检索DGCD中关于子宫内膜癌或腺瘤样增生女性的数据，并补充患者病历中的复发数据，然后与明确参考数据（病理报告和临床期刊）进行比较。
向DGCD报告的病理和手术数据的完整性为97.3%。DGCG与明确参考数据之间的可比性为94.4%。DGCD中所报告数据的一致性为88.3%。对于复发情况，可比性为94.5%，一致性为71.6%。由于数据库的设计，其中复发仅由可选变量组成，因此无法确定完整性。
DGCD中登记的子宫内膜癌手术和病理数据有效且完整，为研究提供了坚实基础。由于复发发生率相对较低，且复发发生时很少录入数据库，因此关于复发的一致性较低。基于本研究，DGCD alone不能提供可为研究提供可靠基础的复发信息。
由日德兰中部地区卫生研究基金以及奥胡斯大学医院妇产科提供资助。
不相关。
