Abohelaika Salah, Kamali Farhad, Avery Peter, Robinson Brian, Kesteven Patrick, Wynne Hilary
Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University, UK.
Age Ageing. 2014 Sep;43(5):708-11. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu074. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
novel oral anticoagulants may be particularly cost-effective when INR control (TTR) with warfarin is poor or monitoring difficult.
the Newcastle upon Tyne monitoring service, set in hospital or general practice and a domiciliary-based service for housebound patients.
to examine anticoagulation stability and costs of monitoring.
three hundred and twenty-six atrial fibrillation patients, 75 years and over, with target INR of two to three, accessing hospital (n = 100), general practice (n = 122) and domiciliary (n = 104) service.
age, co-morbidities, length of warfarin treatment, medications, INR values and dose changes from January to December 2011 were recorded, and costs analysed.
home-monitored patients had taken warfarin for longer, mean 5.2 years, than hospital (3.7) or general practice (3.1) patients. Age and total number of drugs prescribed chronically were negatively related to TTR. INR measurements and dose changes were negatively associated with the duration of treatment, positively correlated with co-morbidities. The mean TTR was 78% in hospital, 71% in general practice and 68% in domiciliary monitored patients. INR was monitored more often in hospital and domiciliary groups than in general practice and more dose changes occurred in the domiciliary group than in others. Costs of warfarin and monitoring were £128 per patient per year for hospital, £126 for general practice and £222 for domiciliary patients.
further exploration of the clinical effectiveness of novel anticoagulants in dependent patients is warranted to determine to what extent trial outcomes so far achieved in a fitter elderly population are influenced by the chronic co-morbidities of old age.
当华法林的国际标准化比值(INR)控制(治疗窗时间,TTR)不佳或监测困难时,新型口服抗凝药可能具有特别的成本效益。
泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔监测服务中心,设在医院或全科医疗诊所,并为居家患者提供上门服务。
研究抗凝稳定性和监测成本。
326例年龄在75岁及以上的房颤患者,目标INR为2至3,分别接受医院(n = 100)、全科医疗诊所(n = 122)和上门服务(n = 104)。
记录2011年1月至12月患者的年龄、合并症、华法林治疗时长、用药情况、INR值及剂量变化,并分析成本。
接受居家监测的患者服用华法林的时间更长,平均为5.2年,而医院患者为3.7年,全科医疗诊所患者为3.1年。年龄和长期开具的药物总数与TTR呈负相关。INR测量和剂量变化与治疗时长呈负相关,与合并症呈正相关。医院监测患者的平均TTR为78%,全科医疗诊所为71%,居家监测患者为68%。医院组和居家组比全科医疗诊所更频繁地监测INR,居家组比其他组发生更多的剂量变化。医院患者华法林及监测的成本为每年每人128英镑,全科医疗诊所为126英镑,居家患者为222英镑。
有必要进一步探索新型抗凝药在依赖他人生活的患者中的临床疗效,以确定到目前为止在身体状况较好的老年人群中取得的试验结果在多大程度上受到老年慢性合并症的影响。