Suppr超能文献

放射学同行评审反馈记分卡:优化儿童医院的透明度、可及性和教育水平

Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.

作者信息

Iyer Ramesh S, Munsell Andrew, Weinberger Edward

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seattle Children׳s Hospital, Seattle, WA.

Department of Radiology, Seattle Children׳s Hospital, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;43(4):169-74. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.03.003.

Abstract

Peer review is a requisite for a comprehensive quality assurance program. Although RADPEER implementations have been well documented, the feedback process has been underemphasized. Our radiology department developed feedback scorecards to address this gap. In this article, we describe our scorecard components, the software applications we independently created and utilize, and how they align missions of quality improvement and radiologist education. The result is a web-based, comment-enhanced, monthly feedback scorecard that to our knowledge is the first of its kind described in the literature.

摘要

同行评审是全面质量保证计划的一项必要条件。尽管放射学同行评审(RADPEER)的实施已有详细记录,但反馈过程一直未得到足够重视。我们放射科制定了反馈计分卡以弥补这一差距。在本文中,我们描述了计分卡的组成部分、我们自主创建和使用的软件应用程序,以及它们如何与质量改进和放射科医生教育的使命保持一致。结果是一个基于网络的、带有评论增强功能的月度反馈计分卡,据我们所知,这是文献中首次描述的此类计分卡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验