• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射学同行评审反馈记分卡:优化儿童医院的透明度、可及性和教育水平

Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.

作者信息

Iyer Ramesh S, Munsell Andrew, Weinberger Edward

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seattle Children׳s Hospital, Seattle, WA.

Department of Radiology, Seattle Children׳s Hospital, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;43(4):169-74. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.03.003.

DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.03.003
PMID:24948210
Abstract

Peer review is a requisite for a comprehensive quality assurance program. Although RADPEER implementations have been well documented, the feedback process has been underemphasized. Our radiology department developed feedback scorecards to address this gap. In this article, we describe our scorecard components, the software applications we independently created and utilize, and how they align missions of quality improvement and radiologist education. The result is a web-based, comment-enhanced, monthly feedback scorecard that to our knowledge is the first of its kind described in the literature.

摘要

同行评审是全面质量保证计划的一项必要条件。尽管放射学同行评审(RADPEER)的实施已有详细记录,但反馈过程一直未得到足够重视。我们放射科制定了反馈计分卡以弥补这一差距。在本文中,我们描述了计分卡的组成部分、我们自主创建和使用的软件应用程序,以及它们如何与质量改进和放射科医生教育的使命保持一致。结果是一个基于网络的、带有评论增强功能的月度反馈计分卡,据我们所知,这是文献中首次描述的此类计分卡。

相似文献

1
Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.放射学同行评审反馈记分卡:优化儿童医院的透明度、可及性和教育水平
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;43(4):169-74. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.03.003.
2
Optimizing peer review: A year of experience after instituting a real-time comment-enhanced program at a children's hospital.优化同行评审:在儿童医院实施实时评论增强计划一年后的经验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 May;198(5):1121-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6724.
3
Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department.同行评审:儿科放射科的经验教训
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;45(2):139-48. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
4
Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.放射学中有意义的同行评审:当前实践与未来潜在方向综述
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Dec;13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
5
Peer review comments augment diagnostic error characterization and departmental quality assurance: 1-year experience from a children's hospital.同行评议意见补充了诊断错误的特征描述和部门质量保证:儿童医院的 1 年经验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jan;200(1):132-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9580.
6
RADPEER scoring white paper.RADPEER评分白皮书。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Jan;6(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.011.
7
Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output.面向共识的小组同行评议:一种新的放射科医生工作产出评审流程。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Feb;11(2):131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
8
Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.放射学同行评审是减少错误并改善患者护理的一个契机。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Dec;1(12):984-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.005.
9
RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.RADPEER质量保证计划:一项关于解释性分歧率的多机构研究。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Jan;1(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/S1546-1440(03)00002-4.
10
RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward.RADPEER同行评审:相关性、用途、关注点、挑战及未来方向。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Sep;11(9):899-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Added value of double reading in diagnostic radiology,a systematic review.诊断放射学中双重读片的附加值:一项系统综述
Insights Imaging. 2018 Jun;9(3):287-301. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0599-0. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
2
Implementation and Validation of PACS Integrated Peer Review for Discrepancy Recording of Radiology Reporting.用于放射学报告差异记录的PACS集成同行评审的实施与验证
J Med Syst. 2016 Sep;40(9):193. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0555-9. Epub 2016 Jul 21.