Suppr超能文献

唑来膦酸输注用于骨质疏松症患者的腰椎椎间融合术

Zoledronic acid infusion for lumbar interbody fusion in osteoporosis.

作者信息

Tu Chao-Wei, Huang Kuo-Feng, Hsu Hsien-Ta, Li Hung-Yu, Yang Stephen Shei-Dei, Chen Yi-Chu

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2014 Nov;192(1):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 May 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of intravenous (IV) infusion of zoledronic acid (ZOL) for lumbar interbody fusion surgery (LIFS) remain unknown. We investigated the efficacy of IV ZOL on clinical outcome and bone fusion after LIFS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients with both degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and osteoporosis who underwent LIFS from January 2007 to April 2010. All patients were followed up for 2 y. Thirty-two were treated with an IV infusion of ZOL 3 d after surgery and a second injection 1 y later, and the other 32 patients did not receive ZOL. Preoperatively and every 3 mo postoperatively, oswestry disability index questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg were compared. Preoperative and final postoperative follow-up to evaluate for subsequent compression fractures were also performed. Pedicle screw loosening, cage subsidence, and fusion rate were documented 2 y after surgery.

RESULTS

At 2-y follow-up, a solid fusion was achieved in 75% of the ZOL group and only 56% of the control group. At final follow up, the incidence of final subsequent vertebral compression fractures (19% of the ZOL group and 51% of the control group, P = 0.006), pedicle screw loosening (18% of the ZOL group and 45% of the control group, P = 0.03), and cage subsidence >2 mm (28% of the ZOL group and only 54% of the control group, P = 0.04) were significantly lower in the ZOL group than in the control group. The ZOL group demonstrated improvement in VAS (for leg pain VAS, 2/10 for the ZOL group and 5/10 for the control group; for back pain VAS, 2/10 for the ZOL group and 6/10 for the control group) and oswestry disability index scores (7/25 for the ZOL group and 16/25 for the control group).

CONCLUSIONS

ZOL treatment has beneficial effects on instrumented LIFS both radiographic and clinically. Thus, ZOL treatment can be recommended for osteoporosis patients undergoing LIFS.

摘要

背景

静脉输注唑来膦酸(ZOL)用于腰椎椎间融合术(LIFS)的临床疗效尚不清楚。我们研究了静脉输注ZOL对LIFS术后临床疗效和骨融合的影响。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了2007年1月至2010年4月期间接受LIFS治疗的64例退行性腰椎滑脱症合并骨质疏松症患者。所有患者均随访2年。32例患者在术后3天接受静脉输注ZOL治疗,并在1年后再次注射,另外32例患者未接受ZOL治疗。术前及术后每3个月比较奥斯威斯残疾指数问卷以及背部和腿部的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。术前及术后最终随访时也对后续椎体压缩骨折进行评估。记录术后2年椎弓根螺钉松动、椎间融合器下沉及融合率情况。

结果

在2年随访时,ZOL组75%实现了牢固融合,而对照组仅为56%。在最终随访时,ZOL组最终后续椎体压缩骨折的发生率(ZOL组为19%,对照组为51%,P = 0.006)、椎弓根螺钉松动率(ZOL组为18%,对照组为45%,P = 0.03)以及椎间融合器下沉>2 mm的发生率(ZOL组为28%,对照组仅为54%,P = 0.04)均显著低于对照组。ZOL组在VAS评分(腿痛VAS,ZOL组为2/10,对照组为5/10;背痛VAS,ZOL组为2/10,对照组为6/10)和奥斯威斯残疾指数评分(ZOL组为7/25,对照组为16/25)方面均有改善。

结论

ZOL治疗在影像学和临床上对器械辅助的LIFS均有有益作用。因此,对于接受LIFS治疗的骨质疏松症患者,可推荐使用ZOL治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验