Norr Aaron M, Allan Nicholas P, Macatee Richard J, Keough Meghan E, Schmidt Norman B
Florida State University, Department of Psychology, 1107 W. Call St., Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA.
University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave, PS-5035, Box 359911, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Aug;59:12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Recently there has been increased interest in emotional and physical tolerance risk factors for mood and anxiety disorders. Three tolerance risk factors that have been shown to be related are anxiety sensitivity (AS), distress tolerance (DT), and discomfort intolerance (DI). Although previous research has demonstrated these constructs are malleable, no research has investigated the effects of an AS intervention on DT or DI. Further, no studies have investigated whether changes in DT or DI play a role in mood and anxiety symptom amelioration due to an AS intervention. Participants (N = 104), who were selected for elevated levels of AS, completed a single-session computer-assisted AS intervention or a control intervention and follow-up assessments at 1-week and 1-month post intervention. Results revealed that the intervention reduced AS and increased DT, but did not affect DI at the 1-week follow-up. Mediation analyses revealed that changes in AS and DT both mediated changes in symptoms (depression, anxiety, worry) due to the intervention at 1-month follow-up, however, when AS and DT were considered in the same model only the effect via AS remained significant. These results have important implications for the nature of the relationships between AS, DT, and DI as well as the specific mechanistic pathways through which an AS intervention ameliorates symptoms.
最近,人们对情绪和身体耐受性作为情绪及焦虑障碍的风险因素越来越感兴趣。已被证明与之相关的三个耐受性风险因素是焦虑敏感性(AS)、痛苦耐受性(DT)和不适耐受性(DI)。尽管先前的研究表明这些构念具有可塑性,但尚无研究调查AS干预对DT或DI的影响。此外,也没有研究探讨DT或DI的变化是否在AS干预导致的情绪和焦虑症状改善中起作用。选取AS水平较高的参与者(N = 104),他们完成了一次计算机辅助的AS干预或对照干预,并在干预后1周和1个月进行随访评估。结果显示,在1周随访时,干预降低了AS并提高了DT,但未影响DI。中介分析表明,在1个月随访时,AS和DT的变化均介导了因干预导致的症状(抑郁、焦虑、担忧)变化,然而,当在同一模型中考虑AS和DT时,只有通过AS的效应仍然显著。这些结果对于AS、DT和DI之间关系的本质以及AS干预改善症状的具体机制途径具有重要意义。