Metrailer Aaron M, Cox Matthew D, Sunde Jumin, Hartzell Larry D, Moore Page C, Dornhoffer John L
*Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; †Arkansas Children's Hospital; and ‡Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, U.S.A.
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1471-3. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000473.
To determine outcomes of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in a cohort of pediatric patients with a history of cleft palate repair.
Retrospective chart review and comparison with a historical control group of patients with no cleft palate anomaly undergoing the same procedure by the same surgeon at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. A total of 37 patients between ages 4 and 19 years inclusive (45 ears), with a history of repaired cleft palate, underwent type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty with or without primary tube insertion from September 2004 to October 2012. Demographics, type of cleft palate, surgical indication, middle ear status, complications, history of myringotomy tube insertion, and auditory outcomes were collected. Results were compared with those for a non-cleft palate cohort that had undergone the same procedure, which had been previously published.
The unadjusted average preoperative and postoperative pure-tone averages for patients with a history of cleft palate were 22.06 and 7.29, respectively, compared with 18.34 and 8.32, respectively, for non-cleft patients. Despite significantly worse preoperative hearing levels among the cleft palate group, there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes with regard to hearing results between the two groups. One patient in the cleft palate group required revision type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty for graft failure, which is comparable to that reported for non-cleft palate patients. Post-tympanoplasty secondary tympanostomy intubation was slightly higher for the cleft palate population.
Type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty, when performed in a pediatric population with a history of cleft palate, can achieve closure and hearing results that are comparable of those in patients with no such anomaly.
确定在一组有腭裂修复病史的儿科患者中进行1型软骨鼓膜成形术的结果。
进行回顾性病历审查,并与一家三级护理儿科医院中由同一位外科医生对无腭裂异常的患者进行相同手术的历史对照组进行比较。2004年9月至2012年10月期间,共有37例年龄在4至19岁(含)之间、有腭裂修复病史的患者接受了1型软骨鼓膜成形术,其中部分患者同时或未同时进行一期置管。收集了人口统计学资料、腭裂类型、手术指征、中耳状况、并发症、鼓膜切开置管史及听力结果。将结果与之前发表的接受相同手术的非腭裂队列患者的结果进行比较。
有腭裂病史患者术前和术后未调整的纯音平均听阈分别为22.06和7.29,而非腭裂患者分别为18.34和8.32。尽管腭裂组术前听力水平明显更差,但两组在听力结果方面的差异无统计学意义。腭裂组有1例患者因移植物失败需要进行1型软骨鼓膜成形术翻修,这与非腭裂患者的报告情况相当。腭裂患者鼓膜成形术后二次鼓膜造口置管率略高。
在有腭裂病史的儿科患者中进行1型软骨鼓膜成形术,其封闭效果和听力结果与无此类异常的患者相当。