Manzi Anatole, Magge Hema, Hedt-Gauthier Bethany L, Michaelis Annie P, Cyamatare Felix R, Nyirazinyoye Laetitia, Hirschhorn Lisa R, Ntaganira Joseph
University of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 20;14:275. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-275.
Despite evidence supporting Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) as a strategy to improve pediatric care in countries with high child mortality, its implementation faces challenges related to lack of or poor post-didactic training supervision and gaps in necessary supporting systems. These constraints lead to health care workers' inability to consistently translate IMCI knowledge and skills into practice. A program providing mentoring and enhanced supervision at health centers (MESH), focusing on clinical and systems improvement was implemented in rural Rwanda as a strategy to address these issues, with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of pediatric care at rural health centers. We explored perceptions of MESH from the perspective of IMCI clinical mentors, mentees, and district clinical leadership.
We conducted focus group discussions with 40 health care workers from 21 MESH-supported health centers. Two FGDs in each district were carried out, including one for nurses and one for director of health centers. District medical directors and clinical mentors had individual in-depth interviews. We performed a hermeneutic analysis using Atlas.ti v5.2.
Study participants highlighted program components in five key areas that contributed to acceptability and impact, including: 1) Interactive, collaborative capacity-building, 2) active listening and relationships, 3) supporting not policing, 4) systems improvement, and 5) real-time feedback. Staff turn-over, stock-outs, and other facility/systems gaps were identified as barriers to MESH and IMCI implementation.
Health care workers reported high acceptance and positive perceptions of the MESH model as an effective strategy to build their capacity, bridge the gap between knowledge and practice in pediatric care, and address facility and systems issues. This approach also improved relationships between the district supervisory team and health center-based care providers. Despite some challenges, many perceived a strong benefit on clinical performance and outcomes. This study can inform program implementers and policy makers of key components needed for developing similar health facility-based mentorship interventions and potential barriers and resistance which can be proactively addressed to ensure success.
尽管有证据支持儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)作为在儿童死亡率高的国家改善儿科护理的一项策略,但其实施面临与缺乏或不良的教学后培训监督以及必要支持系统存在差距相关的挑战。这些限制导致医护人员无法始终如一地将IMCI知识和技能转化为实践。在卢旺达农村实施了一项在卫生中心提供指导和强化监督的项目(MESH),该项目侧重于临床和系统改进,作为解决这些问题的一项策略,其最终目标是提高农村卫生中心的儿科护理质量。我们从IMCI临床导师、学员和地区临床领导的角度探讨了对MESH的看法。
我们与来自21个由MESH支持的卫生中心的40名医护人员进行了焦点小组讨论。在每个地区进行了两次焦点小组讨论,一次针对护士,一次针对卫生中心主任。地区医疗主任和临床导师进行了个人深入访谈。我们使用Atlas.ti v5.2进行了解释性分析。
研究参与者强调了五个关键领域的项目组成部分,这些部分有助于提高可接受性和影响力,包括:1)互动、协作能力建设,2)积极倾听和关系,3)支持而非监管,4)系统改进,5)实时反馈。人员流动、库存短缺以及其他设施/系统差距被确定为MESH和IMCI实施的障碍。
医护人员报告对MESH模式高度认可,并持积极看法,认为它是一种有效的策略,可用于建设他们的能力、弥合儿科护理知识与实践之间的差距以及解决设施和系统问题。这种方法还改善了地区监督团队与卫生中心护理提供者之间的关系。尽管存在一些挑战,但许多人认为对临床绩效和结果有很大益处。本研究可为项目实施者和政策制定者提供信息,说明开展类似的基于卫生设施的指导干预所需的关键组成部分以及可积极应对以确保成功的潜在障碍和阻力。