Division of Pediatric Urology, Aboul-Riche Children's Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Division of Pediatric Urology, Aboul-Riche Children's Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec;10(6):1126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
To describe and evaluate our protocol for management of children≤4years old with obstructive calcular anuria (OCA) and acute renal failure (ARF) to improve selection of initial urinary drainage (ID) method and to facilitate subsequent definitive stone management (DSM) as studies discussing this special group of patients are still few.
Patients with a contraindication to any method of ID were excluded. Decision (percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) or double J (JJ) stent) was based on degree of hydronephrosis and planned DSM. We used 4.8-5Fr JJ or 6-8Fr PCN under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance. According to our protocol, JJ is inserted for hydronephrosis≤grade 1. When the hydronephrosis is >grade 1, patients with radiolucent stones were treated by JJ whatever the site of the stone. When the stones were radiopaque, PCN was reserved for stones in a solitary functioning kidney and bilateral ureteric stones prepared for subsequent bilateral ureterolithotomy (or stone prepared for ureterolithotomy in a solitary kidney). After normalization of renal functions, DSM was staged attacking only one side before discharge. Both sides were cleared at the same session in cases with bilateral ureterolithotomy. Renal or ureteric stones suitable for SWL in a solitary kidney were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL) or ureteroscopy. This was followed also in patients with bilateral stones suitable for SWL by clearing one side using ureteroscopy or PNL before discharge. Open surgery (OS) was reserved for cases with failed ureteroscopy or PNL, for ureteric stones>2.5 cm in size or very large volume complex renal stones. Stone free rate (SFR) was evaluated by CT. Our protocol was evaluated as regard recovery of renal functions, complications, and number of interventions to clear stones.
This study included 62 boys and 22 girls presented with anuria for 1-4 days. JJ and PCN were inserted in 105 and 30 ureterorenal units (URU), respectively. Creatinine returns normal within 72 h. JJ insertion formed a part of DSM in 78/159 (49%) URU (stones prepared for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or oral chemolytic dissolution therapy). PCN was the ideal tract for subsequent PNL in 11/159 (6.9%) URU. Accordingly, ID participated by 55.97% in DSM. Both operative and imaging times were slightly longer with PCN than JJ. There was no statistically significant difference in the insertion success or mean period to return to normal chemistry. Complications of both methods were mild and without any significant difference. Endourologic procedures constituted the majority of our interventions. Open surgical and endoscopic interventions for clearance of stones (including ID, treatment conversion and 2ry procedures) were done once for 25 patients, twice for 43 patients while it was needed three times for 16 patients. Total number of interventions was 149 procedures. SFR was 94%.
Our protocol ensures adequate ID with minimal complications when using our selection criteria in children≤4 years in age with OCA and ARF. It also minimizes number of subsequent procedures to clear stones. Complications and success in insertion and drainage were equivalent in PCN and JJ groups.
描述并评估我们治疗≤4 岁梗阻性结石性无尿(OCA)和急性肾衰竭(ARF)儿童的方案,以改善初始尿路引流(ID)方法的选择,并为随后的确定性结石治疗(DSM)提供便利,因为目前仍缺乏专门讨论这一特殊患者群体的研究。
排除任何 ID 方法禁忌的患者。根据肾盂积水程度和计划的 DSM 决定(经皮肾造瘘术(PCN)或双 J 支架(JJ))。我们在全身麻醉和透视引导下使用 4.8-5Fr JJ 或 6-8Fr PCN。根据我们的方案,JJ 用于肾盂积水≤1 级的患者。当肾盂积水>1 级时,无论结石位置如何,我们都使用 JJ 治疗透光性结石。当结石不透光时,将 PCN 保留用于孤立功能肾中的结石和准备进行双侧输尿管切开取石术(或准备在孤立肾中进行输尿管切开取石术的结石)的双侧输尿管结石。肾功能恢复正常后,在出院前分期攻击单侧 DSM。双侧输尿管切开取石术的患者在同一期清除双侧。适合 SWL 的孤立肾中的肾结石或输尿管结石采用经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)或输尿管镜治疗。对于适合 SWL 的双侧结石患者,我们也通过出院前单侧使用输尿管镜或 PCNL 清除结石。对于输尿管镜或 PCNL 失败的患者、输尿管结石>2.5cm 或体积非常大的复杂肾结石,保留开放性手术(OS)。通过 CT 评估结石清除率(SFR)。我们的方案是评估肾功能恢复、并发症和清除结石所需的干预次数。
本研究纳入了 62 名男孩和 22 名女孩,他们因无尿持续 1-4 天就诊。105 例输尿管肾盂单位(URU)插入 JJ,30 例插入 PCN。肌酐在 72 小时内恢复正常。JJ 插入作为 78/159(49%)URU 中 DSM 的一部分(为体外冲击波碎石术或口服化学溶解治疗准备的结石)。PCN 是随后进行 PCNL 的理想途径,占 11/159(6.9%)URU。因此,ID 参与 DSM 的比例为 55.97%。与 JJ 相比,PCN 的手术和影像学时间略长。插入成功率和恢复正常化学时间无统计学差异。两种方法的并发症均较轻,无明显差异。腔内治疗程序构成了我们干预措施的大部分。为清除结石(包括 ID、治疗转换和 2 次手术),仅对 25 名患者进行了 1 次开放性手术和内镜干预,对 43 名患者进行了 2 次干预,对 16 名患者进行了 3 次干预。总干预次数为 149 次。结石清除率(SFR)为 94%。
我们的方案在≤4 岁 OCA 和 ARF 儿童中使用我们的选择标准时,可确保充分的 ID,且并发症最小。它还最大限度地减少了随后清除结石所需的程序数量。PCN 和 JJ 组的插入和引流成功率和并发症相当。