Elbatanouny Ahmed M, Ragheb Ahmed M, Abdelbary Ahmed M, Fathy Hany, Massoud Amr M, Abd El Latif Ahmed, Moussa Ayman S, Ibrahim Rabie M
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Int J Urol. 2020 Oct;27(10):916-921. doi: 10.1111/iju.14331. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
To compare percutaneous nephrostomy tube versus JJ stent as an initial urinary drainage procedure in kidney stone patients presenting with acute kidney injury.
Between January 2017 and January 2019, 143 patients with acute kidney injury secondary to obstructive kidney stone were prospectively randomized into the percutaneous nephrostomy tube group (71 patients) and JJ stent group (72 patients) at Beni-Suef University Hospital, Beni-Suef, Egypt. Exclusion criteria included candidates for acute dialysis, fever (>38°C), pyonephrosis, pregnancy and uncontrolled coagulopathy. The period required for serum creatinine normalization, failure of insertion, operative and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Definitive stone management for proximal ureteral stones >1.5 cm consisted of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the percutaneous nephrostomy group and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for the JJ stent group. For stone size <1.5 cm, ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy was carried out for both groups. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was carried out for renal stones >2 cm, and shockwave lithotripsy for stones <2 cm. Distal and mid ureteral stones were treated by ureteroscopy.
The percutaneous nephrostomy group had shorter operative time (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the recovery period for normalization of serum creatinine between both groups (P = 0.120). Procedural failure, ureteric mucosal injury and perforations increased in the case of male sex, stone size >1.5 cm and upper ureteric stones in the JJ stent group. Procedural failure, pelvic perforations and intraoperative bleeding increased in case of male sex, mild hydronephrosis and stone size >2.5 cm in the percutaneous nephrostomy group. Suprapubic pain, urethral pain and lower urinary tract symptoms were significant in the JJ stent group. The presence of a JJ stent directed us toward ureteroscopy (P = 0.002) and the presence of a percutaneous nephrostomy directed us toward percutaneous nephrolithotomy (P = 0.001).
Percutaneous nephrostomy facilitates subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy, especially when carried out by a urologist, and it has a higher insertion success rate, a shorter operative time and a lesser incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection than a JJ stent. A JJ stent facilitates subsequent ureteroscopy, but operative complications can increase in the case of proximal ureteral stones >1.5 cm.
比较经皮肾造瘘管与双J支架作为急性肾损伤肾结石患者初始尿液引流方法的效果。
2017年1月至2019年1月,埃及贝尼苏韦夫贝尼苏韦夫大学医院将143例因梗阻性肾结石继发急性肾损伤的患者前瞻性随机分为经皮肾造瘘管组(71例)和双J支架组(72例)。排除标准包括急性透析候选者、发热(>38°C)、肾积脓、妊娠和未控制的凝血病。记录血清肌酐恢复正常所需时间、置管失败情况、手术时间和透视时间。对于近端输尿管结石>1.5 cm的确定性结石处理,经皮肾造瘘组采用经皮肾镜取石术,双J支架组采用输尿管镜激光碎石术。对于结石大小<1.5 cm的情况,两组均采用输尿管镜检查或冲击波碎石术。对于肾结石>2 cm采用经皮肾镜取石术,对于结石<2 cm采用冲击波碎石术。远端和中段输尿管结石采用输尿管镜治疗。
经皮肾造瘘组手术时间较短(P = 0.001)。两组血清肌酐恢复正常的恢复期无显著差异(P = 0.120)。双J支架组中,男性、结石大小>1.5 cm及上段输尿管结石时,手术失败、输尿管黏膜损伤及穿孔发生率增加。经皮肾造瘘组中,男性、轻度肾积水及结石大小>2.5 cm时,手术失败、盆腔穿孔及术中出血发生率增加。双J支架组耻骨上疼痛、尿道疼痛及下尿路症状明显。双J支架的存在使我们倾向于输尿管镜检查(P = 0.002),经皮肾造瘘管的存在使我们倾向于经皮肾镜取石术(P = 0.001)。
经皮肾造瘘便于后续经皮肾镜取石术,尤其是由泌尿外科医生操作时,其置管成功率更高,手术时间更短,术后尿路感染发生率低于双J支架。双J支架便于后续输尿管镜检查,但对于近端输尿管结石>1.5 cm时手术并发症可能增加。