Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, AB, Canada.
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jul;15(8):841-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70265-7. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Treatment of patients with paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia has evolved such that the risk of late effects in survivors treated in accordance with contemporary protocols could be different from that noted in those treated decades ago. We aimed to estimate the risk of late effects in children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated with contemporary protocols.
We used data from similarly treated members of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study is a multicentre, North American study of 5-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed between 1970 and 1986. We included cohort members if they were aged 1·0-9·9 years at the time of diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and had received treatment consistent with contemporary standard-risk protocols for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. We calculated mortality rates and standardised mortality ratios, stratified by sex and survival time, after diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. We calculated standardised incidence ratios and absolute excess risk for subsequent neoplasms with age-specific, sex-specific, and calendar-year-specific rates from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Outcomes were compared with a sibling cohort and the general US population.
We included 556 (13%) of 4329 cohort members treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Median follow-up of the survivors from 5 years after diagnosis was 18·4 years (range 0·0-33·0). 28 (5%) of 556 participants had died (standardised mortality ratio 3·5, 95% CI 2·3-5·0). 16 (57%) deaths were due to causes other than recurrence of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Six (1%) survivors developed a subsequent malignant neoplasm (standardised incidence ratio 2·6, 95% CI 1·0-5·7). 107 participants (95% CI 81-193) in each group would need to be followed-up for 1 year to observe one extra chronic health disorder in the survivor group compared with the sibling group. 415 participants (376-939) in each group would need to be followed-up for 1 year to observe one extra severe, life-threatening, or fatal disorder in the group of survivors. Survivors did not differ from siblings in their educational attainment, rate of marriage, or independent living.
The prevalence of adverse long-term outcomes in children treated for standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia according to contemporary protocols is low, but regular care from a knowledgeable primary-care practitioner is warranted.
National Cancer Institute, American Lebanese-Syrian Associated Charities, Swiss Cancer Research.
随着儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的治疗进展,根据当代方案治疗的幸存者的迟发性影响风险可能与几十年前治疗的患者不同。我们旨在评估按照当代方案治疗的标准风险急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿发生迟发性影响的风险。
我们使用了童年癌症幸存者研究队列中接受类似治疗的成员的数据。童年癌症幸存者研究是一项针对 1970 年至 1986 年期间诊断为儿童癌症的 5 年幸存者的多中心、北美研究。如果诊断为急性淋巴细胞白血病时年龄在 1.0-9.9 岁且接受了与急性淋巴细胞白血病的当代标准风险方案一致的治疗,则将队列成员纳入本研究。我们根据急性淋巴细胞白血病诊断后的性别和生存时间计算死亡率和标准化死亡率比。我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的年龄特异性、性别特异性和日历年特异性率计算随后发生的肿瘤的标准化发病比和绝对超额风险。将结果与同胞队列和美国一般人群进行比较。
我们纳入了 4329 名急性淋巴细胞白血病治疗队列成员中的 556 名(13%)。幸存者从诊断后 5 年开始的中位随访时间为 18.4 年(0.0-33.0)。556 名参与者中有 28 名(5%)死亡(标准化死亡率比为 3.5,95%CI 2.3-5.0)。16 名(57%)死亡归因于急性淋巴细胞白血病复发以外的原因。6 名(1%)幸存者发生了后续恶性肿瘤(标准化发病比为 2.6,95%CI 1.0-5.7)。在幸存者组中,与同胞组相比,每个组随访 1 年需要观察到 1 例额外的慢性健康障碍,则每组需要随访 107 名参与者(95%CI 81-193)。每个组随访 1 年需要观察到 415 名参与者(376-939)中 1 例额外的严重、危及生命或致命障碍。幸存者在教育程度、婚姻率或独立生活方面与同胞没有差异。
按照当代方案治疗的标准风险急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿发生不良长期结局的发生率较低,但需要由有知识的初级保健医生进行常规护理。
美国国家癌症研究所、美国黎巴嫩-叙利亚裔慈善协会、瑞士癌症研究基金会。