Suppr超能文献

咳嗽峰流速在评估神经肌肉疾病患者咳嗽疗效中的价值。一项横断面研究。

The value of cough peak flow in the assessment of cough efficacy in neuromuscular patients. A cross sectional study.

作者信息

Tzani P, Chiesa S, Aiello M, Scarascia A, Catellani C, Elia D, Marangio E, Chetta A

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Lung Function and Respiratory Disease Units University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy -

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Aug;50(4):427-32. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cough efficacy assessment is of clinical relevance in neuromuscular patients. Tests of varying complexity and invasiveness, such as cough peak flow (CPF), maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax) and gastric pressure during cough (Cough Pgas) are routinely available.

AIM

To assess the value of CPF, PEmax and Cough Pgas in the detection of ineffective cough in patients suffering from neuromuscular diseases.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Outpatient laboratory for respiratory muscle function assessment.

POPULATION

Forty-nine patients with neuromuscular diseases (25 F, age 50 ± 15 years).

METHODS

Each patient performed spirometry, CPF, PEmax, Cough Pgas and maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax). Normal values for each test were determined from published and in-house lab data.

RESULTS

In all patients, vital capacity ranged from 46 to 119% of pred. Twenty seven percent of patients resulted under the lower normal limit of CPF and this percentage was significantly lower as compared to that of PEmax and Cough Pgas (51% and 53% respectively, P=0.013). Combining all three tests, the percentage of patients resulting below normal was 22% (P=0.638, as compared to CPF results alone). Additionally, CPF correlated significantly with PImax, PEmax, and Cough Pgas (P<0.01 for each correlation) and by multiple regression analysis PImax and PEmax contributed 65% of CPF variance.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that in neuromuscular patients, PEmax and Cough Pgas values may overdiagnose an ineffective cough. CPF, a non invasive and easy to perform test, is a global measure of voluntary cough. CLINICAL REHABILITATION SETTING:CPF may be relevant in the routine evaluation of patients with neuromuscular diseases, both in research and in rehabilitation settings.

摘要

背景

咳嗽效能评估在神经肌肉疾病患者中具有临床相关性。常规可进行各种复杂程度和侵入性不同的测试,如咳嗽峰流速(CPF)、最大呼气压力(PEmax)和咳嗽时的胃内压力(咳嗽时胃内压,Cough Pgas)。

目的

评估CPF、PEmax和咳嗽时胃内压在检测神经肌肉疾病患者无效咳嗽中的价值。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

呼吸肌功能评估门诊实验室。

研究对象

49例神经肌肉疾病患者(25例女性,年龄50±15岁)。

方法

每位患者进行肺量计检查、CPF、PEmax、咳嗽时胃内压和最大吸气压力(PImax)检查。每项检查的正常值根据已发表的和内部实验室数据确定。

结果

所有患者的肺活量为预计值的46%至119%。27%的患者CPF低于正常下限,与PEmax和咳嗽时胃内压相比,该百分比显著更低(分别为51%和53%,P = 0.013)。综合三项检查,低于正常的患者百分比为22%(与单独CPF结果相比,P = 0.638)。此外,CPF与PImax、PEmax和咳嗽时胃内压显著相关(每项相关性P<0.01),通过多元回归分析,PImax和PEmax解释了CPF变异的65%。

结论

我们的研究表明,在神经肌肉疾病患者中,PEmax和咳嗽时胃内压值可能会过度诊断无效咳嗽。CPF是一种无创且易于执行的检查,是对自主咳嗽的整体测量。临床康复环境:CPF在神经肌肉疾病患者的常规评估中可能具有相关性,无论是在研究还是康复环境中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验