Tomlinson Kyle W, Poorter Lourens, Bongers Frans, Borghetti Fabian, Jacobs Loes, van Langevelde Frank
Community Ecology & Conservation Group, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun 666303, Yunnan, China Resource Ecology Group
Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ann Bot. 2014 Aug;114(2):315-24. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu107. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
Plant relative growth rate (RGR) depends on biomass allocation to leaves (leaf mass fraction, LMF), efficient construction of leaf surface area (specific leaf area, SLA) and biomass growth per unit leaf area (net assimilation rate, NAR). Functional groups of species may differ in any of these traits, potentially resulting in (1) differences in mean RGR of groups, and (2) differences in the traits driving RGR variation within each group. We tested these predictions by comparing deciduous and evergreen savanna trees.
RGR, changes to biomass allocation and leaf morphology, and root non-structural carbohydrate reserves were evaluated for juveniles of 51 savanna species (34 deciduous, 17 evergreen) grown in a common garden experiment. It was anticipated that drivers of RGR would differ between leaf habit groups because deciduous species have to allocate carbohydrates to storage in roots to be able to flush leaves again, which directly compromises their LMF, whereas evergreen species are not subject to this constraint.
Evergreen species had greater LMF and RGR than deciduous species. Among deciduous species LMF explained 27 % of RGR variation (SLA 34 % and NAR 29 %), whereas among evergreen species LMF explained between 2 and 17 % of RGR variation (SLA 32-35 % and NAR 38-62 %). RGR and LMF were (negatively) related to carbohydrate storage only among deciduous species.
Trade-offs between investment in carbohydrate reserves and growth occurred only among deciduous species, leading to differences in relative contribution made by the underlying components of RGR between the leaf habit groups. The results suggest that differences in drivers of RGR occur among savanna species because these have different selected strategies for coping with fire disturbance in savannas. It is expected that variation in the drivers of RGR will be found in other functional types that respond differently to particular disturbances.
植物相对生长速率(RGR)取决于分配到叶片的生物量(叶质量分数,LMF)、叶面积的有效构建(比叶面积,SLA)以及单位叶面积的生物量增长(净同化率,NAR)。物种的功能组在这些性状中的任何一个方面都可能存在差异,这可能导致:(1)不同组的平均RGR存在差异;(2)每组内驱动RGR变化的性状存在差异。我们通过比较落叶和常绿稀树草原树木来检验这些预测。
在一个共同花园实验中,对51种稀树草原物种(34种落叶树种、17种常绿树种)的幼苗进行了RGR、生物量分配和叶片形态变化以及根系非结构性碳水化合物储备的评估。预计RGR的驱动因素在叶习性组之间会有所不同,因为落叶树种必须将碳水化合物分配到根部储存,以便能够再次长出新叶,这直接影响了它们的LMF,而常绿树种则不受此限制。
常绿树种的LMF和RGR均高于落叶树种。在落叶树种中,LMF解释了RGR变化的27%(SLA为34%,NAR为29%),而在常绿树种中,LMF解释了RGR变化的2%至17%(SLA为32% - 35%,NAR为38% - 62%)。仅在落叶树种中,RGR和LMF与碳水化合物储存呈(负)相关。
仅在落叶树种中,碳水化合物储备投资与生长之间存在权衡,导致叶习性组之间RGR的潜在组成部分的相对贡献存在差异。结果表明,稀树草原物种之间RGR的驱动因素存在差异,因为它们在应对稀树草原火灾干扰方面有不同的选择策略。预计在对特定干扰有不同反应的其他功能类型中也会发现RGR驱动因素的差异。