Lopes P C, Fuhrmann A, Carvalho F, Sereno J, Santos M R, Pereira M J, Eriksson J W, Reis F, Carvalho E
Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, 3000 Coimbra, Portugal.
Laboratory of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, IBILI, Medicine Faculty, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Heath-ICNAS, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Biochem Pharmacol. 2014 Sep 1;91(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
Cyclosporine A (CsA) and sirolimus (SRL) are immunosuppressive agents (IA) associated with new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT). This study aims to evaluate the effects of 3-weeks of treatment with either CsA (5 mg/kg BW/day) or SRL (1 mg/kg BW/day) on insulin signaling and expression of markers involved in glucose metabolism in insulin-sensitive tissues, in Wistar rats. Although no differences were observed in fasting glucose, insulin or C-peptide levels, both treated groups displayed an impaired glucose excursion during both glucose and insulin tolerance tests. These results suggest glucose intolerance and insulin resistance. An increase in glucose-6-phosphatase protein levels (68%, p < 0.05) and in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (163%, p < 0.05), a negative regulator of insulin was observed in the CsA-treated group in the liver, indicating enhanced gluconeogenesis and increased insulin resistance. On the other hand, glucokinase protein levels were decreased in the SRL group (35%, p < 0.05) compared to vehicle, suggesting a decrease in glucose disposal. SRL treatment also reduced peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1 alpha protein expression in muscle (~50%, p < 0.05), while no further protein alterations were observed in muscle and perirenal adipose tissue nor with the CsA treatment. Moreover, the phosphorylation of key proteins of the insulin signaling cascade was suppressed in the SRL group, but was unchanged by the CsA treatment. Taken together, these data suggest that CsA treatment enhances gluconeogenic factors in liver, while SRL treatment impairs insulin signaling in peripheral tissues, which can contribute to the development of insulin resistance and NODAT associated with immunosuppressive therapy.
环孢素A(CsA)和西罗莫司(SRL)是与移植后新发糖尿病(NODAT)相关的免疫抑制剂(IA)。本研究旨在评估用CsA(5mg/kg体重/天)或SRL(1mg/kg体重/天)进行3周治疗对Wistar大鼠胰岛素敏感组织中胰岛素信号传导以及参与葡萄糖代谢的标志物表达的影响。尽管在空腹血糖、胰岛素或C肽水平上未观察到差异,但两个治疗组在葡萄糖耐量试验和胰岛素耐量试验期间均表现出血糖波动受损。这些结果提示葡萄糖不耐受和胰岛素抵抗。在CsA治疗组的肝脏中,观察到葡萄糖-6-磷酸酶蛋白水平增加(68%,p<0.05)以及胰岛素的负调节因子蛋白酪氨酸磷酸酶1B增加(163%,p<0.05),表明糖异生增强和胰岛素抵抗增加。另一方面,与载体组相比,SRL组的葡萄糖激酶蛋白水平降低(35%,p<0.05),提示葡萄糖处置减少。SRL治疗还降低了肌肉中过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ共激活因子1α蛋白的表达(约50%,p<0.05),而在肌肉和肾周脂肪组织中未观察到进一步的蛋白改变,CsA治疗也未引起此类改变。此外,SRL组中胰岛素信号级联反应关键蛋白的磷酸化受到抑制,但CsA治疗未使其发生变化。综上所述,这些数据表明CsA治疗增强了肝脏中的糖异生因子,而SRL治疗损害了外周组织中的胰岛素信号传导,这可能导致与免疫抑制治疗相关的胰岛素抵抗和NODAT的发生。