Ferguson Fraser C, Morison Susan, Ryan Cormac G
NHS 24, Caledonia House, Glasgow, UK.
Musculoskeletal Care. 2015 Mar;13(1):42-50. doi: 10.1002/msc.1079. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
The expanding role of physiotherapists, with increasing use of services such as self-referral, means that demonstrating an ability to understanding and ask red-flag questions appropriately has never been more important. The present study investigated how physiotherapists define common red flags, how they ask red-flag questions, which red flags they routinely record and the importance that therapists attribute to individual red-flags.
In this qualitative study, an online questionnaire survey was circulated to physiotherapists using various UK special interests networks. A total of 98 physiotherapists participated in the study, the majority of whom worked exclusively in the National Health Service.
In general, clinicians defined red flags for back pain in line with guidelines but there was little consensus on how therapists asked patients about red flags. Questioning often included undefined terminology and therapists not asking some red-flag questions. Additionally, the more recently recognized flags (vague, non-specific lower-leg symptoms; band-like trunk pain; decreased mobility) had less importance attached to them and were recorded less frequently.
If only certain red flags are being assessed, this may put patients at risk of having serious spinal pathologies going undetected. Thus, strategies encouraging therapists to ask all red-flag questions may be needed. The importance of the more recently recognized red flags may need to be emphasized to clinicians. Finally, the inconsistent way in which the red-flag questions were asked highlights a potential practical barrier to translating red-flag knowledge into clinical practice. There is a need to build on this work, using in-depth qualitative interviews, to gain a deeper understanding of how therapists understand and apply the red flags commonly used in back pain assessment.
随着诸如自我转诊等服务的使用增加,物理治疗师的作用不断扩大,这意味着展示理解并恰当地提出警示问题的能力从未像现在这样重要。本研究调查了物理治疗师如何定义常见的警示信号、他们如何提出警示问题、他们常规记录哪些警示信号以及治疗师对各个警示信号的重视程度。
在这项定性研究中,通过英国各种特殊兴趣网络向物理治疗师发放了在线问卷调查。共有98名物理治疗师参与了该研究,其中大多数仅在国民保健制度工作。
总体而言,临床医生根据指南定义了背痛的警示信号,但对于治疗师如何向患者询问警示信号,几乎没有达成共识。询问通常包括未定义的术语,并且治疗师没有询问一些警示问题。此外,最近才被认识到的警示信号(模糊、非特异性的小腿症状;带状躯干疼痛;活动能力下降)被赋予的重要性较低,记录频率也较低。
如果只评估某些警示信号,这可能会使患者面临严重脊柱病变未被发现的风险。因此,可能需要采取策略鼓励治疗师询问所有警示问题。可能需要向临床医生强调最近才被认识到的警示信号的重要性。最后,询问警示问题的方式不一致凸显了将警示信号知识转化为临床实践的潜在实际障碍。有必要在此基础上开展工作,通过深入的定性访谈,更深入地了解治疗师如何理解和应用背痛评估中常用的警示信号。