Suppr超能文献

非年龄分层泌尿外科诊断相关分组中老年患者的财务风险和医院成本。

Financial risk and hospital cost for elderly patients in non-age stratified urology DRGs.

作者信息

Muñoz E, Wilkins S, Mallet E, Goldstein J, Sterman H, Wise L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Queens Hospital Center, Jamaica, New York.

出版信息

Urology. 1989 May;33(5):445-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90048-4.

Abstract

The Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) hospital payment system may be inequitable for certain groups of Medicare patients. This study of 216 Medicare urology patients in the ten non-age stratified urology DRGs demonstrated that patients seventy years of age and older (70+) had higher resource consumption than patients under seventy years of age (70-). Findings were: (1) older patients (70+) had higher total hospital costs (+12,022 per patient) than younger patients (70-) (+9,872 per patient); (2) a longer hospital length of stay (14.2 days vs 11.6 days); (3) financial risk of +1,756 loss per (70+) patient vs +1,309 profit per (70-) patient (p less than 0.05); (4) more diagnoses and procedures per patient, and (5) a higher mortality (4.0% vs 3.3%). These findings suggest that the current DRG scheme may be inequitable vis-a-vis the older urology patient in non-age stratified DRGs, and thus could limit access and quality of care for these patients in the future.

摘要

诊断相关分组(DRG)医院支付系统可能对某些医疗保险患者群体不公平。这项针对十个未按年龄分层的泌尿外科DRG中的216名医疗保险泌尿外科患者的研究表明,70岁及以上(70+)的患者比70岁以下(70-)的患者资源消耗更高。研究结果如下:(1)老年患者(70+)的总住院费用(每位患者+12,022美元)高于年轻患者(70-)(每位患者+9,872美元);(2)住院时间更长(14.2天对11.6天);(3)(70+)每位患者的财务风险损失为+1,756美元,而(70-)每位患者的利润为+1,309美元(p<0.05);(4)每位患者的诊断和手术更多,以及(5)死亡率更高(4.0%对3.3%)。这些发现表明,在未按年龄分层的DRG中,当前的DRG方案相对于老年泌尿外科患者可能不公平,因此未来可能会限制这些患者获得医疗服务的机会和医疗质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验