Suppr超能文献

用于健康供体干细胞动员的生物类似物粒细胞集落刺激因子:我们需要害怕吗?

Biosimilar granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for healthy donor stem cell mobilization: need we be afraid?

作者信息

Bonig Halvard, Becker Petra S, Schwebig Arnd, Turner Matthew

机构信息

Department for Translational Development of Cellular Therapeutics, Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University Medical School.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2015 Feb;55(2):430-9. doi: 10.1111/trf.12770. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Abstract

Biosimilars are approved biologics with comparable quality, safety, and efficacy to a reference product. Unlike generics, which are chemically manufactured copies of small-molecule drugs with relatively simple chemical structures, the biosimilar designation is applied to drugs that are produced by living organisms, implying much more difficult to control manufacturing and purification procedures. To account for these complexities, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the US Food and Drug Administration, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, and other regulatory authorities have devised and implemented specific, markedly more demanding pathways for the evaluation and approval of biosimilars. To date, several biosimilars have been approved, including versions of somatropin, erythropoietin, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and several biosimilar monoclonal antibodies are currently in development. The reference G-CSF product (Neupogen, Amgen) has been used for many years for prevention and treatment of neutropenia and also for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). However, concerns have been raised about the safety and efficacy of biosimilar G-CSF during PBSC mobilization procedures, especially in healthy donors. This article reviews the available evidence on the use of biosimilar G-CSF in this setting. Aggregate clinical evidence supports the assessment by the EMA of biosimilar and originator G-CSF as highly biologically similar, with respect to desired and undesired effects.

摘要

生物类似药是经批准的生物制品,其质量、安全性和有效性与参照产品相当。与化学合成的小分子药物仿制药不同,小分子药物化学结构相对简单,而生物类似药指的是由活生物体生产的药物,这意味着其生产和纯化过程更难控制。为应对这些复杂性,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)、美国食品药品监督管理局、澳大利亚治疗用品管理局及其他监管机构已设计并实施了特定的、要求明显更高的生物类似药评估和批准途径。迄今为止,已有多种生物类似药获批,包括生长激素、促红细胞生成素和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的类似药,目前还有几种生物类似单克隆抗体正在研发中。参照G-CSF产品(优保津,安进公司)多年来一直用于预防和治疗中性粒细胞减少症,也用于动员外周血干细胞(PBSC)。然而,人们对生物类似G-CSF在PBSC动员过程中的安全性和有效性提出了担忧,尤其是在健康供体中。本文综述了在这种情况下使用生物类似G-CSF的现有证据。总体临床证据支持EMA对生物类似G-CSF和原研G-CSF在预期和非预期效应方面具有高度生物学相似性的评估。

相似文献

10
A clinical comparison of the efficacy and safety of biosimilar G-CSF and originator G-CSF in haematopoietic stem cell mobilization.
Pharmacol Rep. 2014 Apr;66(2):239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2013.09.005. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

9
Regulatory and clinical considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs.生物类似肿瘤药物的监管与临床考量
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Dec;15(13):e594-e605. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70365-1. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

2
A clinical comparison of the efficacy and safety of biosimilar G-CSF and originator G-CSF in haematopoietic stem cell mobilization.
Pharmacol Rep. 2014 Apr;66(2):239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2013.09.005. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
4
G-CSF in Healthy Allogeneic Stem Cell Donors.健康异基因干细胞供体中的粒细胞集落刺激因子
Transfus Med Hemother. 2013 Aug;40(4):225-35. doi: 10.1159/000354196. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
Biosimilar G-CSF (filgrastim) is effective for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and non-cryopreserved autologous transplantation.
Transfus Clin Biol. 2013 Dec;20(5-6):502-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2013.04.109. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
7
Clinical experience with Zarzio® in Europe: what have we learned?在欧洲使用 Zarzio® 的临床经验:我们学到了什么?
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct;21(10):2925-32. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1911-7. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
8
Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell activity by inflammation.炎症对造血干细胞活性的调节。
Front Immunol. 2013 Jul 19;4:204. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00204. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验