Terblanche N C S, Arzola C, Wills K E, Lawson R, Blackford D, Balki M
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Calvary Hospital, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Jul;42(4):460-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200406.
Spinal ultrasonography provides guidance for epidural insertion in obstetric patients. The primary objective of the study was to develop a training program in spinal ultrasound for anaesthetists and to determine its effect on the skill acquisition of anaesthetists with no prior spinal ultrasound experience. Eighteen anaesthetists underwent two structured workshops (one week apart), each followed by a practice session and videorecorded assessments. Participants were randomised to a protocol-driven or non-protocol driven spinal ultrasound teaching program. Two experts rated each individual's performance using a global rating scale (GRS), checklist and image quality scale. The primary outcome was the mean difference in GRS score between the two workshops, analysed using linear mixed models. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess agreement between assessors' ratings. A total of 108 ultrasound scans were performed on five pregnant volunteers during the assessment periods. After adjusting for confounders, GRS scores increased on all three rating scales at the second workshop, this increase being 6.01 points (95% confidence interval 4.56 to 7.46, P<0.001) from a mean score of 28.4 (95% confidence interval 24.8 to 32.0). There was no significant difference in the scores between the two teaching groups (difference in GRS scores=1.36 points, 95% confidence interval -0.77 to 3.50, P=0.211). Intraclass correlation coefficients showed substantial assessor agreement for all three assessment methods (range 0.59 to 0.89). The results demonstrate that programmed spinal ultrasound training sessions involving practice with guidance and feedback from an expert, whether protocol-based or non-protocol based, lead to improved performance.
脊柱超声可为产科患者的硬膜外穿刺提供指导。本研究的主要目的是为麻醉医生制定一项脊柱超声培训计划,并确定其对无脊柱超声经验的麻醉医生技能掌握的影响。18名麻醉医生参加了两次结构化研讨会(间隔一周),每次研讨会后都有一次实践课程并进行视频记录评估。参与者被随机分配到协议驱动或非协议驱动的脊柱超声教学计划中。两名专家使用整体评分量表(GRS)、检查表和图像质量量表对每个人的表现进行评分。主要结局是两次研讨会之间GRS评分的平均差异,采用线性混合模型进行分析。计算组内相关系数以评估评估者评分之间的一致性。在评估期间,对五名怀孕志愿者进行了总共108次超声扫描。在调整混杂因素后,第二次研讨会时所有三个评分量表上的GRS评分均有所提高,从平均得分28.4(95%置信区间24.8至32.0)提高了6.01分(95%置信区间4.56至7.46,P<0.001)。两个教学组之间的评分没有显著差异(GRS评分差异=1.36分,95%置信区间-0.77至3.50,P=0.211)。组内相关系数显示,所有三种评估方法的评估者之间都有高度一致性(范围0.59至0.89)。结果表明,无论是基于协议还是非基于协议的、包含在专家指导和反馈下进行实践的程序化脊柱超声培训课程,都能提高操作表现。