Costa Akf, Xavier Ta, Noritomi Py, Saavedra G, Borges Als
Oper Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):E160-70. doi: 10.2341/13-092-L.
SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence the width of the occlusal isthmus and inlay material had on the stress distribution, displacement, and fracture resistance of upper human premolars. For this in vitro test, 35 intact upper premolars (UPM) were selected and five were kept intact for the control group (group I). The remaining 30 were divided into two experimental groups (n=15) according to the width of isthmus: conservative (CP) and extensive preparation (EP), one third and more than two thirds of cuspal distance, respectively. Five teeth from each experimental group were left without restoration for negative controls (CPnc and EPnc), and the remaining 10 in each group were subdivided according to the inlay material (resin or ceramic): group CPr, CP + indirect resin; group CPc, CP + ceramic; group EPr, EP + indirect resin; and group EPc, EP + ceramic. The cemented inlays were loaded in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture. The fractured specimens were analyzed with stereomicroscopy, and the values of the fracture resistance evaluated by analysis of variance and Tukey test. For the finite element analyses, an average UPM for each group was modeled in Rhinoceros CAD software and imported to Ansys 13.0. An average of 320,000 tetrahedral elements and 540,000 nodes for the seven models were performed using the same experimental simulation setup for each. The models were constrained on the base, and a displacement of 0.02 mm was applied to keep a linear behavior for the analysis. A von Mises stress and total displacement fields were used for the coherence test and the maximum principal stress fields were used for mechanical behavior comparisons. Group I (161.73 ± 22.94) showed a significantly higher mean value than the other experimental groups (EPc: 103.55 ± 15.84; CPc: 94.38 ± 12.35; CPr: 90.31 ± 6.10; EPr: 65.42 ± 10.15; CPnc: 65.46 ± 5.37; EPnc: 58.08 ± 9.62). The stress distribution was different in all of the groups. EPnc showed a higher concentration of tensile stress on the cervical region of the proximal box. CPc and EPc provided a lower tensile stress and a smaller cuspal displacement. Within the limits of this study, the configuration of the inlay preparation is a significant factor in the fracture resistance of premolars: the smaller the amount of remaining tooth, the lower the fracture resistance. In addition, the teeth restored with ceramic materials showed a higher fracture resistance than those restored with composite resin.
摘要 本研究的目的是评估咬合峡宽度和嵌体材料对上颌前磨牙应力分布、位移及抗折性能的影响。在这项体外试验中,选取了35颗完整的上颌前磨牙(UPM),其中5颗保持完整作为对照组(I组)。其余30颗根据峡部宽度分为两个试验组(n = 15):保守预备组(CP)和广泛预备组(EP),峡部宽度分别为牙尖距离的三分之一和三分之二以上。每个试验组中5颗牙齿不做修复作为阴性对照(CPnc和EPnc),每组其余10颗根据嵌体材料(树脂或陶瓷)再细分:CPr组,CP + 间接树脂;CPc组,CP + 陶瓷;EPr组,EP + 间接树脂;EPc组,EP + 陶瓷。将粘结好的嵌体在万能试验机上以0.5 mm/min的十字头速度加载直至断裂。对断裂的试件进行体视显微镜分析,通过方差分析和Tukey检验评估抗折性能值。对于有限元分析,在Rhinoceros CAD软件中为每个组建立一颗上颌前磨牙的平均模型,并导入到Ansys 13.0中。对七个模型平均使用320,000个四面体单元和540,000个节点,每个模型都采用相同的实验模拟设置。模型在底部进行约束,并施加0.02 mm的位移以保持分析中的线性行为。使用von Mises应力和总位移场进行一致性检验,使用最大主应力场进行力学行为比较。I组(161.73 ± 22.94)的平均值显著高于其他试验组(EPc组:103.55 ± 15.84;CPc组:94.38 ± 12.35;CPr组:90.31 ± 6.10;EPr组:65.42 ± 10.15;CPnc组:65.46 ± 5.37;EPnc组:58.08 ± 9.62)。所有组的应力分布均不同。EPnc组在近中盒颈部区域的拉应力集中较高。CPc组和EPc组的拉应力较低,牙尖位移较小。在本研究的范围内,嵌体预备的形态是前磨牙抗折性能的一个重要因素:剩余牙体组织量越少,抗折性能越低。此外,用陶瓷材料修复的牙齿比用复合树脂修复的牙齿具有更高的抗折性能。