Suppr超能文献

HIT 研究:膜翅目昆虫鉴定测试——人们在识别蜇人昆虫方面的准确率有多高?

The HIT study: Hymenoptera Identification Test--how accurate are people at identifying stinging insects?

机构信息

Malcolm Grow Medical Clinics and Surgery Center, Department of Allergy/Immunology, Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

Eglin Hospital, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Sep;113(3):267-70. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stinging insects in the order Hymenoptera include bees, wasps, yellow jackets, hornets, and ants. Hymenoptera sting injuries range from localized swelling to rarely death. Insect identification is helpful in the management of sting injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of adults in identifying stinging insects and 2 insect nests.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study using a picture-based survey to evaluate an individual's success at identifying honeybees, wasps, bald-face hornets, and yellow jackets. Bald-face hornet and paper wasp nest identification also was assessed in this study.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty participants completed the questionnaire. Overall, the mean number of correct responses was 3.2 (SD 1.3) of 6. Twenty participants (3.1%) correctly identified all 6 stinging insects and nests and only 10 (1.6%) were unable to identify any of the pictures correctly. The honeybee was the most accurately identified insect (91.3%) and the paper wasp was the least correctly identified insect (50.9%). For the 6 questions regarding whether the participant had been stung in the past by any of the insects (including an unidentified insect), 91% reported being stung by at least 1. Men were more successful at identify stinging insects correctly (P = .002), as were participants stung by at least 4 insects (P = .018).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the general perception that adults are poor discriminators in distinguishing stinging insects and nests with the exception of the honeybee. Men and those participants who reported multiple stings to at least 4 insects were more accurate overall in insect identification.

摘要

背景

膜翅目昆虫包括蜜蜂、黄蜂、马蜂、胡蜂和蚂蚁。膜翅目昆虫蜇伤范围从局部肿胀到罕见的死亡。昆虫鉴定有助于蜇伤的处理。

目的

确定成年人识别蜇人昆虫和 2 种昆虫巢穴的准确性。

方法

这是一项横断面、多中心研究,使用基于图片的调查来评估个体识别蜜蜂、黄蜂、秃脸胡蜂和马蜂的能力。本研究还评估了秃脸胡蜂和纸黄蜂巢的识别。

结果

644 名参与者完成了问卷调查。总体而言,正确回答的平均数量为 6 个中的 3.2(SD 1.3)。20 名参与者(3.1%)正确识别了所有 6 种蜇人昆虫和巢穴,只有 10 名参与者(1.6%)无法正确识别任何图片。蜜蜂是识别最准确的昆虫(91.3%),纸黄蜂是识别最不准确的昆虫(50.9%)。对于 6 个关于参与者过去是否被任何昆虫蜇伤的问题(包括未识别的昆虫),91%的人报告至少被 1 种昆虫蜇伤过。男性在正确识别蜇人昆虫方面更成功(P=.002),至少被 4 种昆虫蜇伤的参与者也更成功(P=.018)。

结论

这项研究支持了一般观点,即成年人在区分蜇人昆虫和巢穴方面的识别能力较差,但蜜蜂除外。男性和那些报告至少被 4 种昆虫蜇伤的参与者在昆虫识别方面总体上更准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验