Suppr超能文献

评估基于多学科头颈能力的解剖学与放射学综合教学方法在放射肿瘤学中的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

D'Souza Leah, Jaswal Jasbir, Chan Francis, Johnson Marjorie, Tay Keng Yeow, Fung Kevin, Palma David

机构信息

Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 26;14:124. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-124.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modern radiation oncology demands a thorough understanding of gross and cross-sectional anatomy for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Complex anatomic sites present challenges for learners and are not well-addressed in traditional postgraduate curricula. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) based head-and-neck gross and radiologic anatomy program for radiation oncology trainees was developed, piloted, and empirically assessed for efficacy and learning outcomes.

METHODS

Four site-specific MDT head-and-neck seminars were implemented, each involving a MDT delivering didactic and case-based instruction, supplemented by cadaveric presentations. There was no dedicated contouring instruction. Pre- and post-testing were performed to assess knowledge, and ability to apply knowledge to the clinical setting as defined by accuracy of contouring. Paired analyses of knowledge pretests and posttests were performed by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Fifteen post-graduate trainees participated. A statistically significant (p < 0.001) mean absolute improvement of 4.6 points (17.03%) was observed between knowledge pretest and posttest scores. Contouring accuracy was analyzed quantitatively by comparing spatial overlap of participants' pretest and posttest contours with a gold standard through the dice similarity coefficient. A statistically significant improvement in contouring accuracy was observed for 3 out of 20 anatomical structures. Qualitative and quantitative feedback revealed that participants were more confident at contouring and were enthusiastic towards the seminars.

CONCLUSIONS

MDT seminars were associated with improved knowledge scores and resident satisfaction; however, increased gross and cross-sectional anatomic knowledge did not translate into improvements in contouring accuracy. Further research should evaluate the impact of hands-on contouring sessions in addition to dedicated instructional sessions to develop competencies.

摘要

背景

现代放射肿瘤学要求对大体解剖和横断面解剖有透彻的理解,以便用于诊断和治疗。复杂的解剖部位给学习者带来了挑战,而传统的研究生课程并未很好地解决这一问题。我们开发、试行并实证评估了一个针对放射肿瘤学实习生的基于多学科团队(MDT)的头颈大体和放射解剖学项目的疗效和学习成果。

方法

开展了四次针对特定部位的MDT头颈研讨会,每次研讨会都有一个MDT进行理论讲授和基于病例的指导,并辅以尸体演示。没有专门的轮廓勾画指导。进行了课前和课后测试,以评估知识以及将知识应用于临床环境的能力(通过轮廓勾画的准确性来定义)。通过Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验对知识课前测试和课后测试进行配对分析。

结果

15名研究生实习生参与其中。在知识课前测试和课后测试分数之间观察到平均绝对提高4.6分(17.03%),具有统计学显著性(p < 0.001)。通过将参与者课前和课后轮廓的空间重叠与金标准通过骰子相似系数进行比较,对轮廓勾画准确性进行了定量分析。在20个解剖结构中有3个观察到轮廓勾画准确性有统计学显著性提高。定性和定量反馈显示,参与者在轮廓勾画方面更有信心,并且对研讨会充满热情。

结论

MDT研讨会与知识分数的提高和住院医师满意度相关;然而,大体和横断面解剖知识的增加并未转化为轮廓勾画准确性的提高。进一步的研究应该评估除了专门的教学课程之外,实践轮廓勾画课程对培养能力的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aee/4102036/b1d41114d944/1472-6920-14-124-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验