• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隆乳的三维成像:这项技术能提供准确的模拟效果吗?

Three-Dimensional Imaging for Breast Augmentation: Is This Technology Providing Accurate Simulations?

作者信息

Roostaeian Jason, Adams William P

机构信息

Dr Roostaeian is an assistant clinical instructor in the Division of Plastic Surgery at the University of California-Los Angeles.

Dr Adams is an Associate Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Aug;34(6):857-75. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14538805. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1177/1090820X14538805
PMID:24970274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients considering breast augmentation, 3-dimensional (3D) imaging provides a preoperative simulation of the postoperative result. However, the clinical accuracy of these simulations has not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared preoperative simulations with postoperative results of breast augmentation to permit more informed decisions about breast augmentation.

METHODS

To determine differences between simulations and actual results, volumetric and contour analyses were performed for patients who underwent 3D imaging both preoperatively and 3 months after breast augmentation. All patients received round smooth silicone implants or anatomically shaped cohesive silicone gel implants; the mean volume was 295 cc.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (40 breasts) underwent 3D imaging both pre- and postoperatively. There were no procedural complications or revisions. The mean difference between preoperative simulation and postoperative breast volume was 27.2 cc (range, 1.4-99.5 cc), representing a 9.2% mean difference in volume and an accuracy of 90.8%. The mean absolute difference (root mean square) of all surface points along the breast in aggregate was 4.0 mm (range, 1.8-8.3 mm). No specific location along the surface contour of the breast could be identified as having the greatest differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative simulation provided by 3D imaging is >90% accurate in predicting postoperative breast volume. The mean absolute differential for surface contour in this study was 4 mm, representing 98.4% accuracy based on average surface area.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

背景

对于考虑隆胸的患者,三维(3D)成像可提供术后结果的术前模拟。然而,这些模拟的临床准确性尚未得到评估。

目的

作者比较了隆胸术前模拟与术后结果,以便对隆胸做出更明智的决策。

方法

为了确定模拟结果与实际结果之间的差异,对术前及隆胸术后3个月均接受3D成像的患者进行了容积和轮廓分析。所有患者均接受圆形光滑硅胶植入物或解剖形状的粘性硅胶凝胶植入物;平均体积为295立方厘米。

结果

20例患者(40个乳房)术前后均接受了3D成像。未出现手术并发症或修复情况。术前模拟与术后乳房体积的平均差异为27.2立方厘米(范围为1.4 - 99.5立方厘米),体积平均差异为9.2%,准确率为90.8%。乳房整体所有表面点的平均绝对差异(均方根)为4.0毫米(范围为1.8 - 8.3毫米)。乳房表面轮廓上没有特定位置被确定为差异最大的部位。

结论

3D成像提供的术前模拟在预测术后乳房体积方面准确率>90%。本研究中表面轮廓的平均绝对差异为4毫米,基于平均表面积计算准确率为98.4%。

证据水平

3级

相似文献

1
Three-Dimensional Imaging for Breast Augmentation: Is This Technology Providing Accurate Simulations?隆乳的三维成像:这项技术能提供准确的模拟效果吗?
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Aug;34(6):857-75. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14538805. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
2
Evaluating 3D Simulation Accuracy for Breast Augmentation Outcomes: A Volumetric and Surface Contour Analysis in Chinese Patients.评估乳房增大手术效果的 3D 模拟准确性:中国患者的体积和表面轮廓分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(19):3878-3895. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04007-z. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.三维评估隆乳术及解剖型和圆形乳房假体对手术乳房形态变化的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;36(4):879-87. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-9892-3. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
4
3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.隆胸手术的三维分析确定手术变化及其与植入物尺寸的关系。
Ann Plast Surg. 2009 May;62(5):570-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819faff9.
5
Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.按手术切口、解剖位置和植入物类型分层的原发性乳房增大临床试验结果。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Sep;66(9):1165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.046. Epub 2013 May 9.
6
Transaxillary Nonendoscopic Subpectoral Augmentation Mammaplasty: A 10-Year Experience With Gel vs Saline in 2000 Patients-With Long-Term Patient Satisfaction Measured by the BREAST-Q.经腋窝非内镜下胸大肌后隆胸术:2000例患者使用凝胶与盐水假体的10年经验——采用BREAST-Q评估长期患者满意度
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Jul;34(5):696-713. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14530552. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
7
Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra high-profile breast implants.高凸度和超高凸度乳房植入物的临床试验结果。
Aesthet Surg J. 2013 May;33(4):529-39. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13484035. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
8
Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation.Portrait 3D 手术模拟平台在隆胸手术中的临床准确性和可重复性。
Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Jan;33(1):84-92. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12469807. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
9
Clinical Evaluation of Shaped Gel Breast Implant Rotation Using High-Resolution Ultrasound.使用高分辨率超声对塑形凝胶乳房植入物旋转进行的临床评估
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Mar 1;37(3):290-296. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw179.
10
Comparing Round and Anatomically Shaped Implants in Augmentation Mammaplasty: The Experts' Ability to Differentiate the Type of Implant.隆乳术中圆形与解剖形植入物的比较:专家区分植入物类型的能力。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):60-64. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002896.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Patient Involvement in Implant Size Selection on Satisfaction With Breast Size: An Analysis of 1840 Primary Augmentations.患者参与植入体尺寸选择对乳房尺寸满意度的影响:1840例初次隆乳术分析
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Aug 18;45(9):899-905. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaf085.
2
Prediction model for intraoperative implant volume using the 3D surface imaging system (VECTRA XT 3D) in direct-to-implant breast reconstructions.在直接植入式乳房重建中使用3D表面成像系统(VECTRA XT 3D)预测术中植入物体积的模型
Gland Surg. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1428-1436. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-148. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Three-dimensional Simulation on Patient-reported Outcomes Following Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Breast: A Randomized Trial.
乳腺癌肿瘤整形与重建手术后患者报告结局的三维模拟:一项随机试验
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 May 15;12(5):e5804. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005804. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Coronal, Sagittal, and Horizontal Classification of the Chest Shape and Its Role in Selection of Proper Implants.胸部形状的冠状面、矢状面和水平面分类及其在合适植入物选择中的作用。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):e5422. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005422. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Morphological Aesthetics Assessment of the Predicted 3D Simulation Results and the Actual Results of Breast Augmentation.乳房隆乳术预测三维模拟结果与实际结果的形态美学评估。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Feb;48(4):568-579. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03597-4. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Initial Assessment of VECTRA Three-Dimensional Imaging to Accurately Simulate Breast Volume Changes in Transfeminine Patients: A Mannequin Study.VECTRA三维成像对准确模拟女性化患者乳房体积变化的初步评估:一项人体模型研究
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Feb 15;5:ojad015. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad015. eCollection 2023.
7
Brassiere Cup Size Agreement between Patients and Plastic Surgeons: Do Surgeons and Patients Speak the Same Size Language?患者与整形外科医生之间的胸罩罩杯尺寸共识:医生和患者说的是同一种尺寸语言吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):e5046. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005046. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Effect of Pre-Surgical Orthopedic Treatment on Hard and Soft Tissue Morphology in Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate.术前正畸治疗对唇腭裂婴儿软硬组织形态的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;13(8):1444. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081444.
9
Three-Dimensional Surface Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Breast Volume: A Validation Study.三维表面分析在乳房体积术前预测中的验证研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Dec 1;152(6):1153-1162. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010473. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
10
Gel Cohesivity and Breast Augmentation: Applications to Clinical Practice.凝胶内聚力与隆乳术:在临床实践中的应用
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Dec 7;4:ojac088. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac088. eCollection 2022.