Egrot Marc, Houngnihin Roch, Baxerres Carine, Damien Georgia, Djènontin Armel, Chandre Fabrice, Pennetier Cédric, Corbel Vincent, Remoué Franck
MIVEGEC, Maladies Infectieuses à Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle, IRD 224-CNRS 5290-Universités de Montpellier 1 & 2, Montpellier, France.
Malar J. 2014 Jun 28;13:247. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-247.
One of the control tools to reduce malaria transmission is the use of LLINs. However, several studies show that household bed net use is quite low. A study was developed to better understand the cultural factors that might explain these gaps in Benin. One reason mentioned is that bed nets can catch on fire and cause harm. This paper presents a summary of these findings, their analysis and the ensuing issues.
This anthropological study is based on an inductive qualitative approach, including 91 semi-structured interviews conducted from July 2011 to March 2012 in a health district in Southern Benin.
Fifty-six persons stated that bed nets can catch on fire but do not always refer to specific facts. However, 34 of the 56 people narrate specific events they heard or experienced. 39 accounts were geographically located and situated in time, with various details. In 27 situations, people were burned, for which 12 people reportedly died.
The disparity between these results and the dearth of bibliographic documentation in the initial search prompted a more in-depth literature review: 16 contributions between 1994 and 2013 were found. Bed net fires were noted in 10 countries, but it is impossible to ascertain the frequency of such events. Moreover, bodily harm can be significant, and several cases of death attributed to bed net fires were noted.
Indisputably, the use of bed nets to reduce the impact of this terrible disease is an optimal control method. However, the perception that LLINs have a potentially negative effect hinders the use rate in the real world, at least for some. If some people fear the risk of fires, this possibility must be addressed during information and prevention sessions on malaria, with a communication strategy tailored to specific social contexts. Moreover, all possible measures should be taken to limit the harm suffered by individuals and their families.
使用长效驱虫蚊帐是减少疟疾传播的控制手段之一。然而,多项研究表明,家庭蚊帐的使用率相当低。开展了一项研究,以更好地理解可能导致贝宁出现这些差距的文化因素。提到的一个原因是蚊帐可能着火并造成伤害。本文介绍了这些研究结果的总结、分析及后续问题。
这项人类学研究采用归纳定性方法,2011年7月至2012年3月在贝宁南部一个卫生区进行了91次半结构化访谈。
56人表示蚊帐可能着火,但并不总是提及具体事实。然而,这56人中的34人讲述了他们听到或经历的具体事件。39份描述有地理位置和时间定位,并包含各种细节。在27起事件中,有人被烧伤,据报道其中12人死亡。
这些结果与初步搜索中缺乏文献记录之间的差异促使进行更深入的文献综述:发现了1994年至2013年间的16份文献。在10个国家都有蚊帐着火的记录,但无法确定此类事件的发生频率。此外,身体伤害可能很严重,还记录了几起因蚊帐着火导致死亡的案例。
无可争议的是,使用蚊帐来减少这种可怕疾病的影响是一种最佳控制方法。然而,认为长效驱虫蚊帐有潜在负面影响的观念阻碍了其在现实世界中的使用率,至少对一些人来说是这样。如果一些人担心火灾风险,那么在疟疾信息和预防宣传活动中必须解决这个可能性问题,并制定适合特定社会背景的传播策略。此外,应采取一切可能措施,以限制个人及其家庭所遭受的伤害。