Suppr超能文献

成人髋部骨折手术中麻醉类型的比较安全性:回顾性队列研究。

Comparative safety of anesthetic type for hip fracture surgery in adults: retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2014 Jun 27;348:g4022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of anesthesia type on the risk of in-hospital mortality among adults undergoing hip fracture surgery in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Premier research database, United States.

PARTICIPANTS

73,284 adults undergoing hip fracture surgery on hospital day 2 or greater between 2007 and 2011. Of those, 61,554 (84.0%) received general anesthesia, 6939 (9.5%) regional anesthesia, and 4791 (6.5%) combined general and regional anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

In-hospital all cause mortality.

RESULTS

In-hospital deaths occurred in 1362 (2.2%) patients receiving general anesthesia, 144 (2.1%) receiving regional anesthesia, and 115 (2.4%) receiving combined anesthesia. In the multivariable adjusted analysis, when compared with general anesthesia the mortality risk did not differ significantly between regional anesthesia (risk ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.11) or combined anesthesia (1.00, 0.82 to 1.22). A mixed effects analysis accounting for differences between hospitals produced similar results: compared with general anesthesia the risk from regional anesthesia was 0.91 (0.75 to 1.10) and from combined anesthesia was 0.98 (0.79 to 1.21). Findings were also consistent in subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large nationwide sample of hospital admissions, mortality risk did not differ significantly by anesthesia type among patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Our results suggest that if the previously posited beneficial effect of regional anesthesia on short term mortality exists, it is likely to be more modest than previously reported.

摘要

目的

评估美国成人髋部骨折手术中麻醉类型对院内死亡率的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

设置

美国 Premier 研究数据库。

参与者

2007 年至 2011 年期间住院日 2 天或以上接受髋部骨折手术的 73284 名成年人。其中,61554 人(84.0%)接受全身麻醉,6939 人(9.5%)接受区域麻醉,4791 人(6.5%)接受全身和区域联合麻醉。

主要观察指标

院内全因死亡率。

结果

在接受全身麻醉的 1362 名(2.2%)患者、接受区域麻醉的 144 名(2.1%)患者和接受联合麻醉的 115 名(2.4%)患者中发生院内死亡。在多变量调整分析中,与全身麻醉相比,区域麻醉的死亡率风险无显著差异(风险比 0.93,95%置信区间 0.78 至 1.11)或联合麻醉(1.00,0.82 至 1.22)。考虑到医院之间差异的混合效应分析得出了类似的结果:与全身麻醉相比,区域麻醉的风险为 0.91(0.75 至 1.10),联合麻醉的风险为 0.98(0.79 至 1.21)。亚组分析也得出了一致的结果。

结论

在这项大型全国性住院样本中,接受髋部骨折手术的患者的死亡率风险在麻醉类型之间无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,如果先前提出的区域麻醉对短期死亡率有有益影响,那么这种影响可能比之前报道的更为温和。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0731/4793652/a228cc1edcc2/pate018638.f1_default.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验