• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高极不成熟(妊娠24至28周)婴儿的存活率——代价是什么?

Increasing the survival of extremely-immature (24- to 28-weeks' gestation) infants--at what cost?

作者信息

Doyle L W, Murton L J, Kitchen W H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1989 May 15;150(10):558-63, 567-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136693.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136693.x
PMID:2497306
Abstract

In one tertiary perinatal centre, the advent of positive-pressure assisted ventilation in the 1970s improved the survival of neonates of 24 to 28 completed weeks of gestation. However, the rate of increase in the resources for assisted ventilation and the improvements in survival rates were stepwise and not smooth. Consequently, it has been possible to calculate the cost-effectiveness of neonatal intensive care up to the time of hospital discharge over two separate eras of stable consumption of resources for assisted ventilation. During 1977-1983, to produce one survivor at 24-weeks' gestation compared with one at 28-weeks' gestation consumed 14.4-times the number of patient-days of assisted ventilation, and 4.9-times more of the total nursery resources; the cost-effectiveness of intensive care during this period decreased with decreasing maturity. The over-all cost-effectiveness up to the time of hospital discharge for infants of 24- to 28-weeks' gestation during 1977-1983, compared with 1971-1974, when assisted ventilation was rare, was $62,268 per additional survivor. After 1983, the consumption of resources for assisted ventilation more than doubled in infants of 24- to 28-weeks' gestation. However, there was a diminishing return with respect to the gains in survival during 1984-1986 and the costs per additional survivor averaged $99,574, which was 60% more than were those for 1977-1983. We speculate that to improve survival further in the most-immature infants by increasing resources for assisted ventilation only can be more difficult and more expensive, and even less cost-effective.

摘要

在一家三级围产期中心,20世纪70年代正压辅助通气的出现提高了孕24至28周新生儿的存活率。然而,辅助通气资源的增加速度和存活率的提高是逐步的,并不平稳。因此,在辅助通气资源消耗稳定的两个不同时期,有可能计算出直至出院时新生儿重症监护的成本效益。在1977 - 1983年期间,与孕28周的新生儿相比,要使一名孕24周的新生儿存活,辅助通气的患者天数消耗是其14.4倍,总保育资源消耗是其4.9倍;在此期间,重症监护的成本效益随着成熟度降低而下降。与1971 - 1974年(当时辅助通气很少见)相比,1977 - 1983年期间孕24至28周婴儿直至出院时的总体成本效益为每增加一名存活者62,268美元。1983年之后,孕24至28周婴儿的辅助通气资源消耗增加了一倍多。然而,在1984 - 1986年期间,存活率的提高带来的回报逐渐减少,每增加一名存活者的成本平均为99,574美元,比1977 - 1983年高出60%。我们推测,仅通过增加辅助通气资源来进一步提高最不成熟婴儿的存活率可能会更加困难和昂贵,甚至成本效益更低。

相似文献

1
Increasing the survival of extremely-immature (24- to 28-weeks' gestation) infants--at what cost?提高极不成熟(妊娠24至28周)婴儿的存活率——代价是什么?
Med J Aust. 1989 May 15;150(10):558-63, 567-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136693.x.
2
Escalating consumption of nursery resources by extremely immature infants.极不成熟婴儿对保育资源的消耗不断增加。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Aug;27(3):201-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1987.tb00986.x.
3
Assisted ventilation and survival of extremely low birthweight infants.极低出生体重儿的辅助通气与存活情况
J Paediatr Child Health. 1996 Apr;32(2):138-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb00910.x.
4
Trends in the incidence and associated factors of late-onset sepsis associated with improved survival in extremely preterm infants born at 23-26 weeks' gestation: a retrospective study.23-26 孕周极早产儿晚发型败血症发病趋势及其与存活率提高的相关因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 May 23;18(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1130-y.
5
The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight.早产的代价:按胎龄和出生体重进行量化
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;102(3):488-92. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00617-3.
6
Outcomes of infants born at 22-27 weeks' gestation in Victoria according to outborn/inborn birth status.根据出生于外院/本院的出生状态,维多利亚州妊娠22 - 27周出生婴儿的结局。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Mar;102(2):F153-F161. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310313. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
7
Population-based study of infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation in New South Wales, Australia, in 1992-3. New South Wales Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Study Group.1992 - 1993年澳大利亚新南威尔士州基于人群的孕28周前出生婴儿的研究。新南威尔士州新生儿重症监护病房研究小组。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999 Jul;13(3):288-301. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1999.00193.x.
8
Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab in New Zealand.帕利珠单抗在新西兰的成本效益。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2002 Aug;38(4):352-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00790.x.
9
Early death, morbidity, and need of treatment among extremely premature infants.极早早产儿的早期死亡、发病率及治疗需求
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1289-98. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1482.
10
Clinical outcomes and cost of the moderately preterm infant.中度早产婴儿的临床结局与成本
Adv Neonatal Care. 2007 Apr;7(2):80-7. doi: 10.1097/01.anc.0000267913.58726.f3.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Early Peritoneal Dialysis in Infants after Cardiac Surgery (EPICS) trial.心脏手术后婴儿早期腹膜透析(EPICS)试验的研究方案和统计分析计划
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 19;24(2):188-193. doi: 10.51893/2022.2.OA9. eCollection 2022 Jun 6.
2
Data analysis of the benefits of an electronic registry of information in a neonatal intensive care unit in Greece.希腊一家新生儿重症监护病房信息电子登记系统效益的数据分析
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2008 Jul 28;5:10.
3
The long-term prognosis of pre-term infants: conceptual, methodological, and ethical issues.
早产儿的长期预后:概念、方法和伦理问题。
Hum Nat. 1994;5(1):103-26. doi: 10.1007/BF02692194.
4
The cost of neonatal care: reviewing the evidence.
Soz Praventivmed. 1995;40(6):361-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01325418.
5
Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.极低孕周胎儿有早产风险的女性的管理。加拿大儿科学会胎儿与新生儿委员会、加拿大妇产科学会母胎医学委员会
CMAJ. 1994 Sep 1;151(5):547-53.