Organisational Behaviour Area, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France
Organisational Behaviour Area, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.
Psychol Sci. 2014 Aug;25(8):1581-91. doi: 10.1177/0956797614537280. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
Five studies examined the relationship between talent and team performance. Two survey studies found that people believe there is a linear and nearly monotonic relationship between talent and performance: Participants expected that more talent improves performance and that this relationship never turns negative. However, building off research on status conflicts, we predicted that talent facilitates performance-but only up to a point, after which the benefits of more talent decrease and eventually become detrimental as intrateam coordination suffers. We also predicted that the level of task interdependence is a key determinant of when more talent is detrimental rather than beneficial. Three archival studies revealed that the too-much-talent effect emerged when team members were interdependent (football and basketball) but not independent (baseball). Our basketball analysis also established the mediating role of team coordination. When teams need to come together, more talent can tear them apart.
五项研究考察了人才与团队绩效之间的关系。两项调查研究发现,人们认为人才与绩效之间存在线性且近乎单调的关系:参与者期望更多的人才可以提高绩效,并且这种关系永远不会出现负面。然而,根据有关地位冲突的研究,我们预测,人才可以促进绩效,但仅限于一定程度,超过这个程度,更多人才的好处就会减少,最终由于团队内部协调受到影响而变得有害。我们还预测,任务相互依存度的水平是决定何时更多人才有害而不是有益的关键决定因素。三项档案研究表明,当团队成员相互依存(足球和篮球)而不是独立(棒球)时,就会出现人才过剩效应。我们的篮球分析还确定了团队协调的中介作用。当团队需要团结起来时,更多的人才可能会使他们分裂。