Shah Ruchit A, Subban Vijayakumar, Lakshmanan Anitha, Narayanan Srinivasan, Udhayakumaran Kalaichelvan, Pakshirajan Balaji, Krishnamoorthy Jaishankar, Latchumanadhas Kalidass, Janakiraman Ezhilan, Mullasari Ajit S
Consultant, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, India.
Consultant, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, India.
Indian Heart J. 2014 May-Jun;66(3):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of various initial strategies of loop diuretic administration in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) on diuresis, renal function, electrolyte balance and clinical outcomes.
Consecutive patients admitted with ADHF were randomized into three groups - intravenous furosemide infusion + intravenous dopamine, intravenous furosemide bolus in two divided doses and intravenous furosemide continuous infusion alone. At 48 h, the treating physician could adjust the diuretic strategy. Primary endpoint was negative fluid balance at 24 h after admission. Secondary end points were duration of hospital stay, negative fluid balance at 48, 72, 96 h, the trend of serum electrolytes, and renal function and 30 day clinical outcome (death and emergency department visits).
Overall ninety patients (thirty in each group) were included in the study. There was a greater diuresis in first 24 h (p = 0.002) and a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.023) with the bolus group. There was no significant difference in renal function and serum sodium and serum potassium levels. There was no difference in the number of emergency department visits among the three groups.
All three modes of diuretic therapies can be practiced with no difference in worsening of renal function and electrolyte levels. Bolus dose administration with its rapid volume loss and shorter hospital stay might be a more effective diuretic strategy.
评估急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者采用不同初始袢利尿剂给药策略对利尿、肾功能、电解质平衡及临床结局的安全性和有效性。
将连续收治的ADHF患者随机分为三组——静脉注射呋塞米+静脉注射多巴胺组、静脉注射呋塞米分两次大剂量推注组和单纯静脉持续输注呋塞米组。在48小时时,主治医生可调整利尿策略。主要终点为入院后24小时的负液体平衡。次要终点为住院时间、48、72、96小时的负液体平衡、血清电解质变化趋势、肾功能及30天临床结局(死亡和急诊就诊)。
该研究共纳入90例患者(每组30例)。大剂量推注组在最初24小时内利尿效果更好(p = 0.002),住院时间更短(p = 0.023)。肾功能、血清钠和血清钾水平无显著差异。三组间急诊就诊次数无差异。
三种利尿治疗方式均可采用,且对肾功能恶化和电解质水平无差异。大剂量推注给药因其快速的容量丢失和较短的住院时间可能是一种更有效的利尿策略。