Suppr超能文献

持续静脉输注与大剂量间歇静脉输注襻利尿剂治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭的前瞻性随机试验

Continuous versus bolus intermittent loop diuretic infusion in acutely decompensated heart failure: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Palazzuoli Alberto, Pellegrini Marco, Ruocco Gaetano, Martini Giuseppe, Franci Beatrice, Campagna Maria Stella, Gilleman Marilyn, Nuti Ranuccio, McCullough Peter A, Ronco Claudio

出版信息

Crit Care. 2014 Jun 28;18(3):R134. doi: 10.1186/cc13952.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous loop diuretics are a cornerstone of therapy in acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We sought to determine if there are any differences in clinical outcomes between intravenous bolus and continuous infusion of loop diuretics.

METHODS

Subjects with ADHF within 12 hours of hospital admission were randomly assigned to continuous infusion or twice daily bolus therapy with furosemide. There were three co-primary endpoints assessed from admission to discharge: the mean paired changes in serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and reduction in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Secondary endpoints included the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI), change in body weight and six months follow-up evaluation after discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 43 received a continuous infusion and 39 were assigned to bolus treatment. At discharge, the mean change in serum creatinine was higher (+0.8 ± 0.4 versus -0.8 ± 0.3 mg/dl P <0.01), and eGFR was lower (-9 ± 7 versus +5 ± 6 ml/min/1.73 m(2) P <0.05) in the continuous arm. There was no significant difference in the degree of weight loss (-4.1 ± 1.9 versus -3.5 ± 2.4 kg P = 0.23). The continuous infusion arm had a greater reduction in BNP over the hospital course, (-576 ± 655 versus -181 ± 527 pg/ml P = 0.02). The rates of AKI were comparable (22% and 15% P = 0.3) between the two groups. There was more frequent use of hypertonic saline solutions for hyponatremia (33% versus 18% P <0.01), intravenous dopamine infusions (35% versus 23% P = 0.02), and the hospital length of stay was longer in the continuous infusion group (14. 3 ± 5 versus 11.5 ± 4 days, P <0.03). At 6 months there were higher rates of re-admission or death in the continuous infusion group, 58% versus 23%, (P = 0.001) and this mode of treatment independently associated with this outcome after adjusting for baseline and intermediate variables (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.57, 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 6.58 P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of ADHF, continuous infusion of loop diuretics resulted in greater reductions in BNP from admission to discharge. However, this appeared to occur at the consequence of worsened renal filtration function, use of additional treatment, and higher rates of rehospitalization or death at six months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01441245. Registered 23 September 2011.

摘要

引言

静脉注射襻利尿剂是急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)治疗的基石。我们试图确定静脉推注和持续输注襻利尿剂在临床结局上是否存在差异。

方法

入院12小时内的ADHF患者被随机分配接受持续输注或每日两次的呋塞米推注治疗。从入院到出院评估了三个共同主要终点:血清肌酐、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的平均配对变化以及B型利钠肽(BNP)的降低。次要终点包括急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率、体重变化以及出院后六个月的随访评估。

结果

共有43例接受持续输注,39例被分配接受推注治疗。出院时,持续输注组的血清肌酐平均变化更高(+0.8±0.4对比-0.8±0.3mg/dl,P<0.01),eGFR更低(-9±7对比+5±6ml/min/1.73m²,P<0.05)。体重减轻程度无显著差异(-4.1±1.9对比-3.5±2.4kg,P=0.23)。在住院期间,持续输注组的BNP降低幅度更大(-576±655对比-181±527pg/ml,P=0.02)。两组的AKI发生率相当(22%和15%,P=0.3)。持续输注组因低钠血症更频繁使用高渗盐溶液(33%对比18%,P<0.01)、静脉输注多巴胺(35%对比23%,P=0.02),且住院时间更长(14.3±5对比11.5±4天,P<0.03)。在6个月时,持续输注组的再入院或死亡率更高,分别为58%和23%(P=0.001),并且在调整基线和中间变量后,这种治疗方式与该结局独立相关(调整后风险比=2.57,95%置信区间,1.01至6.58,P=0.04)。

结论

在ADHF情况下,持续输注襻利尿剂从入院到出院导致BNP更大幅度降低。然而,这似乎是以肾滤过功能恶化、使用额外治疗以及六个月时更高的再住院率或死亡率为代价的。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01441245。2011年9月23日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a98/4227080/86709201422a/cc13952-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验