Gagliotti C, Ricchizzi E, Buttazzi R, Tumietto F, Resi D, Moro M L
Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale Emilia-Romagna, Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127, Bologna, Italy,
Infection. 2014 Oct;42(5):869-73. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0649-6. Epub 2014 Jun 29.
Defined daily doses (DDD) are widely used as a unit to measure drug use in hospital and community settings. However, discrepancies exist between DDD and actual prescribed daily dose (PDD). The present study aims at estimating an alternative PDD (PDD-proxy) to calculate rates of systemic antibiotic consumption and to compare these results with those obtained using DDD.
The study considered a 9-year period (2004-2012) and included the 17 Health Trusts (HTs) in the Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy. Drugs under study were antibacterials for systemic use (group J01). Data were obtained from the database for hospital drug prescription of Emilia-Romagna Region. The PDD-proxy was estimated by averaging the doses of antibiotic prescriptions from a point prevalence survey for healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use, conducted in Emilia-Romagna hospitals in 2012.
Significant discrepancies between DDD and PDD were observed, especially for some antibiotics, resulting in DDD rates that were systematically higher than PDD-proxy rates. In 2012, HT median rates of antibiotic consumption were 90 DDD/100 bed days and 70 PDD-proxy/100 bed-days. However, PDD-proxy and DDD rates showed comparable trends within HTs, although some HTs ranked differently when one or the other measure was used. Interquartile ranges of DDD rates were systematically wider than those of PDD-proxy rates in most years in the period of interest.
Comparison of HT antibiotic consumption using DDDs may artificially increase observed differences and affect the true HT ranking. Therefore, an additional unit of measurement is useful for in-depth analysis at the local level.
限定日剂量(DDD)被广泛用作衡量医院和社区环境中药物使用情况的单位。然而,DDD与实际规定日剂量(PDD)之间存在差异。本研究旨在估算一种替代的PDD(PDD替代指标),以计算全身性抗生素的使用速率,并将这些结果与使用DDD获得的结果进行比较。
该研究涵盖9年期间(2004 - 2012年),纳入了意大利艾米利亚 - 罗马涅地区的17个医疗信托机构(HTs)。所研究的药物为全身性使用的抗菌药物(J01组)。数据来自艾米利亚 - 罗马涅地区医院药物处方数据库。PDD替代指标通过对2012年在艾米利亚 - 罗马涅医院进行的医疗相关感染和抗菌药物使用现况调查中的抗生素处方剂量进行平均估算得出。
观察到DDD与PDD之间存在显著差异,尤其是对于某些抗生素,导致DDD速率系统性地高于PDD替代指标速率。2012年,各医疗信托机构抗生素使用的中位数速率分别为90 DDD/100床日和70 PDD替代指标/100床日。然而,尽管在使用一种或另一种测量方法时,一些医疗信托机构的排名有所不同,但PDD替代指标和DDD速率在各医疗信托机构中显示出可比的趋势。在感兴趣的时间段内,大多数年份中DDD速率的四分位间距系统性地比PDD替代指标速率的四分位间距更宽。
使用DDD对各医疗信托机构的抗生素使用情况进行比较可能会人为地增加观察到的差异,并影响各医疗信托机构的真实排名。因此,额外的测量单位对于地方层面的深入分析是有用的。