Gray Phillip J, Mak Raymond H, Yeap Beow Y, Cryer Sarah K, Pinnell Nancy E, Christianson Laura W, Sher David J, Arvold Nils D, Baldini Elizabeth H, Chen Aileen B, Kozono David E, Swanson Scott J, Jackman David M, Alexander Brian M
Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Lung Cancer. 2014 Aug;85(2):239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Optimal therapy for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) presenting with synchronous brain-only oligometastases (SBO) is not well defined. We sought to analyze the effect of differing therapeutic paradigms in this subpopulation.
We retrospectively analyzed NSCLC patients with 1-4 SBO diagnosed between 1/2000 and 1/2011 at our institution. Patients with T0 tumors or documented Karnofsky Performance Status <70 were excluded. Aggressive thoracic therapy (ATT) was defined as resection of the primary disease or chemoradiotherapy whose total radiation dose exceeded 45 Gy. Cox proportional hazards and competing risks models were used to analyze factors affecting survival and first recurrence in the brain.
Sixty-six patients were included. Median follow-up was 31.9 months. Intrathoracic disease extent included 9 stage I, 10 stage II and 47 stage III patients. Thirty-eight patients received ATT, 28 did not. Patients receiving ATT were younger (median age 55 vs. 60.5 years, p=0.027) but were otherwise similar to those who did not. Receipt of ATT was associated with prolonged median overall survival (OS) (26.4 vs. 10.5 months; p<0.001) with actuarial 2-year rates of 54% vs. 26%. ATT remained associated with OS after controlling for age, thoracic stage, performance status and initial brain therapy (HR 0.40, p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, the risk of first failure in the brain was associated with receipt of ATT (HR 3.62, p=0.032) and initial combined modality brain therapy (HR 0.34, p=0.046).
Aggressive management of thoracic disease in NSCLC patients with SBO is associated with improved survival. Careful management of brain disease remains important, especially for those treated aggressively.
对于仅出现同步脑寡转移(SBO)的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,最佳治疗方案尚未明确。我们试图分析不同治疗模式对该亚组患者的影响。
我们回顾性分析了2000年1月至2011年1月在我院诊断为1 - 4个SBO的NSCLC患者。排除T0肿瘤患者或记录的卡诺夫斯基功能状态评分<70的患者。积极胸部治疗(ATT)定义为原发性疾病的切除术或总辐射剂量超过45 Gy的放化疗。采用Cox比例风险模型和竞争风险模型分析影响生存和脑内首次复发的因素。
纳入66例患者。中位随访时间为31.9个月。胸内疾病范围包括9例I期、10例II期和47例III期患者。38例患者接受了ATT,28例未接受。接受ATT的患者更年轻(中位年龄55岁对60.5岁,p = 0.027),但在其他方面与未接受者相似。接受ATT与中位总生存期(OS)延长相关(26.4个月对10.5个月;p<0.001),2年精算生存率分别为54%和26%。在控制年龄、胸段分期、功能状态和初始脑部治疗后,ATT仍与OS相关(风险比0.40,p = 0.009)。多因素分析显示,脑内首次失败的风险与接受ATT(风险比3.62,p = 0.032)和初始联合模式脑部治疗(风险比0.34,p = 0.046)相关。
对SBO的NSCLC患者进行积极的胸部疾病管理可提高生存率。对脑部疾病进行仔细管理仍然很重要,特别是对于那些接受积极治疗的患者。