• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲晚期胃肠道癌患者中,与氟尿嘧啶相比,S-1的生存获益:一项荟萃分析。

Survival benefit from S-1 as compared to Fluorouracil in Asian patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cao Chunxiang, Zhang Xunlei, Kuang Meng, Gu Dongying, He Mingliang, Chen Jinfei, Tang Cuiju

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Cancer Sci. 2014 Aug;105(8):1008-14. doi: 10.1111/cas.12465.

DOI:10.1111/cas.12465
PMID:24974863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4317849/
Abstract

Whether S-1 could replace 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) or not in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer (including advanced gastric cancer [AGS] and metastatic colorectal cancer [mCRC]) in Asian patients has been controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the activity, efficacy and toxicity of S-1-based versus 5-Fu-based chemotherapy in those Asian patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by electronic search of Pubmed. Relevant abstracts were manually searched to identify relevant trials. A total of 2182 patients from eight RCTs were included, and our results demonstrated that S-1-based chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.00) and overall response rate (ORR) (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09-2.70), but no significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit was found between arms (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72-1.06). Subgroup analyses revealed that S-1-based chemotherapy significantly improved OS and ORR in subgroups of patients with non-platinum containing regimens (P = 0.041; P = 0.034) and patients with no prior chemotherapy history (P = 0.025; P = 0.016). Statistically significant improvements of PFS and ORR in the S-1-based chemotherapy were observed in the subgroup of patients with AGC (P < 0.001; P = 0.005). S-1-based chemotherapy was characterized by significantly higher incidences of diarrhea, fatigue and thrombocytopenia, and a lower incidence of nausea. This analysis provided strong evidence for survival benefits of S-1, and S-1-based chemotherapy could be considered to replace 5-Fu-based therapy for the treatment of advanced GI cancer in Asian patients.

摘要

在亚洲患者中,S-1在晚期胃肠道(GI)癌(包括晚期胃癌[AGS]和转移性结直肠癌[mCRC])治疗中是否能取代5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)一直存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在比较亚洲患者中基于S-1的化疗与基于5-Fu的化疗的活性、疗效和毒性。通过对PubMed进行电子检索来识别随机对照试验(RCT)。手动检索相关摘要以识别相关试验。纳入了来自八项RCT的2182例患者,我们的结果表明,基于S-1的化疗显著改善了总生存期(OS)(风险比[HR],0.87;95%置信区间[CI],0.77 - 1.00)和总缓解率(ORR)(优势比[OR],1.72;95%CI,1.09 - 2.70),但两组之间无显著的无进展生存期(PFS)获益(HR,0.87;95%CI,0.72 - 1.06)。亚组分析显示,基于S-1的化疗在不含铂方案的患者亚组(P = 0.041;P = 0.034)和无既往化疗史的患者亚组(P = 0.025;P = 0.016)中显著改善了OS和ORR。在AGS患者亚组中,基于S-1的化疗观察到PFS和ORR有统计学显著改善(P < 0.001;P = 0.005)。基于S-1的化疗的特征是腹泻、疲劳和血小板减少的发生率显著更高,而恶心的发生率更低。该分析为S-1的生存获益提供了有力证据,基于S-1的化疗可被考虑取代基于5-Fu的疗法用于亚洲患者晚期GI癌的治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/7b28a30559c3/cas0105-1008-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/413d531800af/cas0105-1008-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/9e503c1e1034/cas0105-1008-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/3ac75cd9988f/cas0105-1008-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/7b28a30559c3/cas0105-1008-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/413d531800af/cas0105-1008-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/9e503c1e1034/cas0105-1008-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/3ac75cd9988f/cas0105-1008-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0504/4317849/7b28a30559c3/cas0105-1008-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival benefit from S-1 as compared to Fluorouracil in Asian patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer: a meta-analysis.亚洲晚期胃肠道癌患者中,与氟尿嘧啶相比,S-1的生存获益:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Sci. 2014 Aug;105(8):1008-14. doi: 10.1111/cas.12465.
2
Comparison of Platinum/S-1 and Platinum/5-Fluorouracil as First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.铂类药物联合 S-1 与铂类药物联合氟尿嘧啶一线治疗晚期胃癌或胃食管结合部腺癌的疗效比较:基于随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Chemotherapy. 2020;65(1-2):11-20. doi: 10.1159/000506671. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Can S-1 replace fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer? A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.S-1能否替代氟尿嘧啶用于晚期胃癌治疗?一项符合PRISMA标准的系统评价和Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3916. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003916.
4
A Meta-analysis Reveals S-1-based Chemotherapy Improves the Survival of Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.一项荟萃分析显示,基于S-1的化疗可提高晚期胃癌患者的生存率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(16):e652. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000652.
5
S-1-based therapy versus 5-FU-based therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.S-1 方案与 5-FU 方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Med Oncol. 2011 Dec;28(4):1004-11. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9594-0. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of S-1-based and capecitabine-based regimens in gastrointestinal cancer: a meta-analysis.基于S-1和基于卡培他滨的方案治疗胃肠道癌的疗效与安全性比较:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 2;9(1):e84230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084230. eCollection 2014.
7
S-1-based versus 5-FU-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.以S-1为基础的化疗与以5-氟尿嘧啶为基础的化疗作为晚期胃癌一线治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Tumour Biol. 2014 Aug;35(8):8201-8. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2099-2. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
The efficacy and safety of S-1-based regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于S-1方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):696-712. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0587-8. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Capecitabine for the treatment for advanced gastric cancer: efficacy, safety and ethnicity.卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌:疗效、安全性和种族差异。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Jun;37(3):266-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2011.01289.x. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
10
S-1-based vs non-S-1-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.晚期胃癌中基于S-1的化疗与非基于S-1的化疗:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 7;20(33):11886-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11886.

引用本文的文献

1
A Study of the S-1 or Capecitabine as First-line Regimen in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real World Study.S-1或卡培他滨作为转移性结直肠癌患者一线治疗方案的研究:一项真实世界研究
J Cancer. 2020 Jan 20;11(7):1839-1845. doi: 10.7150/jca.36929. eCollection 2020.
2
Can S-1 replace fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer? A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.S-1能否替代氟尿嘧啶用于晚期胃癌治疗?一项符合PRISMA标准的系统评价和Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3916. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003916.
3
Chemoradiation therapy with S-1 for primary squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum: report of three cases.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment options in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives.转移性胃癌患者的治疗选择:现状与未来展望
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):3905-15. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3905.
2
Leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab versus S-1 and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (SOFT): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial.亚叶酸钙、氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂联合贝伐珠单抗与 S-1 和奥沙利铂联合贝伐珠单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者(SOFT):一项开放标签、非劣效性、随机 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Dec;14(13):1278-86. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70490-X. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
3
S-1 用于直肠癌原发性鳞状细胞癌的放化疗:三例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2015 Dec;1(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40792-015-0025-5. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
4
Circulating tumor cell count as a biomarker of a specific gastric cancer subgroup characterized by bone metastasis and/or disseminated intravascular coagulation - an early indicator of chemotherapeutic response.循环肿瘤细胞计数作为以骨转移和/或弥散性血管内凝血为特征的特定胃癌亚组的生物标志物——化疗反应的早期指标。
Oncol Lett. 2016 Feb;11(2):1294-1298. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.4056. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
5
The efficacy and safety of S-1-based regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于S-1方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):696-712. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0587-8. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
6
Pharmacologic resistance in colorectal cancer: a review.结直肠癌中的药理学耐药性:综述
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2016 Jan;8(1):57-84. doi: 10.1177/1758834015614530.
7
A meta-analysis of safety and efficacy on first-line S-1 therapy in cancer patients.一线 S-1 治疗癌症患者的安全性和疗效的荟萃分析。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):487-97. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2015.07.21.
A multicentre randomised trial comparing weekly paclitaxel + S-1 with weekly paclitaxel + 5-fluorouracil for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
多中心随机对照试验比较每周紫杉醇+替吉奥与每周紫杉醇+5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期胃癌患者的疗效。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Sep;49(14):2995-3002. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.05.021. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
4
S-1 for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.S-1 用于治疗胃肠道癌。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Sep;13(13):1943-59. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.709234. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
5
Therapeutic management of breast cancer in the elderly.老年乳腺癌的治疗管理。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Apr;12(6):945-60. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.540570. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
6
Pharmacotherapy for pediatric soft-tissue sarcomas.儿科软组织肉瘤的药物治疗。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Mar;12(4):517-31. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.524926.
7
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
8
Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus fluorouracil and folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised phase 2/3 non-inferiority study (FIRIS study).伊立替康联合 S-1(IRIS)对比氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙联合伊立替康(FOLFIRI)二线治疗转移性结直肠癌:一项随机 2/3 期非劣效性研究(FIRIS 研究)。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):853-60. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70181-9. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
9
Pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1605-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0901557.
10
Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial.多中心 III 期研究:顺铂/替吉奥对比顺铂/持续滴注氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期胃或胃食管腺癌:FLAGS 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1547-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4706. Epub 2010 Feb 16.