• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[2型糖尿病患者对流程指标的依从性以及初级保健中的激励措施关联]

[Compliance with process indicators in people with type 2 diabetes and linking incentives in Primary Care].

作者信息

Pascual de la Pisa Beatriz, Márquez Calzada Cristina, Cuberos Sánchez Carla, Cruces Jiménez José Miguel, Fernández Gamaza Manuel, Martínez Martínez María Isabel

机构信息

Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Sevilla, España.

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Gestión de la Investigación en Salud de Sevilla, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2015 Mar;47(3):158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2014.05.004
PMID:24975202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6983827/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pay-for-performance programs to improve the quality of health care are extending gradually, particularly en Primary Health Care. Our aim was to explore the relationship between the degree of compliance with the process indicators (PrI) of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Primary Care and linkage to incentives.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study.

SETTING

Six Primary Health Care centers in Seville Aljarafe District randomly selected and stratified by population size.

PARTICIPANTS

From 3.647 adults included in Integrated Healthcare Process of T2DM during 2008, 366 patients were included according sample size calculation by stratified random sampling.

MEASUREMENTS

PrI: eye and feet examination, glycated hemoglobin, lipid profile, microalbuminuria and electrocardiogram. Confounding: Age, gender, characteristics town for patients and professional variables.

RESULTS

The mean age was 66.36 years (standard deviation [DE]: 11,56); 48.9% were women. PrI with better compliance were feet examination, glycated hemoglobin and lipid profile (59.6%, 44.3% and 44%, respectively). 2.7% of patients had simultaneous compliance of the six PrI and 11.74% of patients three PrI linkage to incentives. Statistical association was observed in the compliance of the PrI incentives linked or not (P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of compliance with the PrI for screening chronic complications of T2DM is mostly low but this was higher on indicators linked to incentives.

摘要

目的

旨在提高医疗质量的绩效薪酬计划正在逐步推广,尤其是在初级卫生保健领域。我们的目的是探讨初级保健中2型糖尿病(T2DM)过程指标(PrI)的依从程度与激励措施之间的关系。

设计

横断面、描述性观察性研究。

地点

从塞维利亚阿尔哈拉费区随机选取并按人口规模分层的6个初级卫生保健中心。

参与者

在2008年纳入T2DM综合医疗过程的3647名成年人中,根据分层随机抽样的样本量计算,纳入了366名患者。

测量指标

PrI:眼部和足部检查、糖化血红蛋白、血脂谱、微量白蛋白尿和心电图。混杂因素:年龄、性别、患者所在城镇特征和专业变量。

结果

平均年龄为66.36岁(标准差[SD]:11.56);48.9%为女性。依从性较好的PrI是足部检查、糖化血红蛋白和血脂谱(分别为59.6%、44.3%和44%)。2.7%的患者同时符合所有六项PrI,11.74%的患者三项PrI与激励措施相关。在与激励措施相关或不相关的PrI依从性方面观察到统计学关联(P = 0.001)。

结论

T2DM慢性并发症筛查PrI的依从程度大多较低,但与激励措施相关的指标依从性较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875d/6983827/b81d2789e9bc/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875d/6983827/b81d2789e9bc/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875d/6983827/b81d2789e9bc/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
[Compliance with process indicators in people with type 2 diabetes and linking incentives in Primary Care].[2型糖尿病患者对流程指标的依从性以及初级保健中的激励措施关联]
Aten Primaria. 2015 Mar;47(3):158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
2
Compliance with quality prescribing indicators linked to financial incentives: what about not incentivized indicators?: an observational study.与经济激励措施相关的质量处方指标的依从性:那么未受激励的指标呢?一项观察性研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;70(3):303-11. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1610-9. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
3
Compliance with quality prescribing indicators in terms of their relationship to financial incentives.遵守与经济激励相关的质量处方指标。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;69(10):1845-53. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1542-4. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
4
[Efficacy of the strategy to improve the quality indicators of Diabetes Mellitus 2 Care Process in Advanced Diabetes Centre Macarena].[改善马卡雷纳高级糖尿病中心2型糖尿病护理流程质量指标策略的疗效]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Jan;51(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.010. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
5
[Primary care for diabetic patients: a quality improvement cycle].[糖尿病患者的初级护理:质量改进循环]
Rev Calid Asist. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):302-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
Recorded quality of primary care for patients with diabetes in England before and after the introduction of a financial incentive scheme: a longitudinal observational study.英格兰实行经济激励方案前后对糖尿病患者初级保健质量的记录:一项纵向观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):53-64. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001033. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
7
Do family physicians need more payment for working better? Financial incentives in primary care.家庭医生工作表现更佳就需要获得更多报酬吗?初级医疗中的经济激励措施。
Aten Primaria. 2014 May;46(5):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
8
The impact of financial incentives to improve quality indicators in patients with diabetes in Swiss primary care: a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.提高瑞士初级保健中糖尿病患者质量指标的财务激励措施的影响:一项集群随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e023788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023788.
9
Chasms in Achievement of Recommended Diabetes Care among Geographic Regions in Korea.韩国各地区在实现推荐的糖尿病护理方面存在差距。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Aug 12;34(31):e190. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e190.
10
Psychosocial factors in adherence to pharmacological treatment and diabetes mellitus control in patients over 65.65 岁以上患者药物治疗依从性和糖尿病控制的社会心理因素。
Aten Primaria. 2022 May;54(5):102302. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102302. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
[Relationship between process indicators measured using electronic records and intermediate health outcomes in patients with diabetes].
Rev Calid Asist. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 May 15.
2
Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999-2010.美国糖尿病护理目标的实现,1999-2010 年。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 25;368(17):1613-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1213829.
3
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病的诊断与分类
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S67-74. doi: 10.2337/dc13-S067.
4
Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.英国的按效付费:质量和结果框架的影响:系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;10(5):461-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1377.
5
Effect of a UK pay-for-performance program on ethnic disparities in diabetes outcomes: interrupted time series analysis.英国按绩效付费计划对糖尿病治疗结果的种族差异的影响:中断时间序列分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 May-Jun;10(3):228-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.1335.
6
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
7
Association of practice size and pay-for-performance incentives with the quality of diabetes management in primary care.实践规模和按绩效付费激励与初级保健中糖尿病管理质量的关联。
CMAJ. 2011 Sep 6;183(12):E809-16. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101187. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
8
Review: relation between quality-of-care indicators for diabetes and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review.综述:糖尿病护理质量指标与患者结局的关系:系统文献回顾。
Med Care Res Rev. 2011 Jun;68(3):263-89. doi: 10.1177/1077558710394200. Epub 2011 May 2.
9
Impact of a pay-for-performance incentive scheme on age, sex, and socioeconomic disparities in diabetes management in UK primary care.绩效薪酬激励计划对英国初级医疗中糖尿病管理方面的年龄、性别及社会经济差异的影响。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Oct-Dec;33(4):336-49. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181f68f1d.
10
Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.系统评价:医疗保健中绩效付费的效果、设计选择和背景。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 23;10:247. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247.