• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者颈动脉狭窄的患病率及预测因素

Prevalence and predictors of carotid artery stenosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

作者信息

Steinvil Arie, Leshem-Rubinow Eran, Abramowitz Yigal, Shacham Yacov, Arbel Yaron, Banai Shmuel, Bornstein Natan M, Finkelstein Ariel, Halkin Amir

机构信息

Departments of Cardiology and Neurology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25585. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.25585
PMID:24975558
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to analyze the prevalence and predictors of Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

BACKGROUND

CAS is associated with the risk of periprocedural stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, little is known about the prevalence of and clinical significance of CAS in the setting of TAVI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing a carotid Doppler study the day before TAVI were followed prospectively. CAS was defined in accordance with current practice guidelines. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent correlates of CAS.

RESULTS

The study included 171 patients (age 82 ± 6, male gender 47%). Carotid atherosclerosis (CA, defined as any carotid plaque) was present in 164 (96%) of patients, and CAS (peak systolic velocity [PSV] ≥ 125 cm/sec; ≥50% diameter stenosis) in 57 (33%) patients. Severe CAS (PSV ≥ 230 cm/sec; ≥70% stenosis, or near occlusion) was found in 15 (9%) patients. By multivariate analysis, smoking and a higher Euroscore independently predicted the presence of CAS. Patients in the present TAVI cohort had a significantly higher prevalence of both unilateral and bilateral CAS ≥ 50% than those in a previously reported cohort (n = 494 patients, age ≥ 70) undergoing clinically driven coronary angiography (33% vs. 20%, OR = 1.9, P = 0.001; and, 13% vs. 6%, OR = 2.3, P = 0.003, respectively). CAS was not independently associated with 30-day mortality or stroke rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CAS in patients undergoing TAVI is high, exceeding that observed in patients undergoing catheterization for coronary indications. The impact of CAS on clinical outcomes following TAVI merits further research.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是分析经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者中颈动脉狭窄(CAS)的患病率及预测因素。

背景

CAS与心脏手术患者围手术期卒中风险相关。然而,对于TAVI背景下CAS的患病率及临床意义知之甚少。

方法

对TAVI前一天接受颈动脉多普勒检查的连续患者进行前瞻性随访。CAS根据现行实践指南定义。采用逻辑回归模型确定CAS的独立相关因素。

结果

该研究纳入了171例患者(年龄82±6岁,男性占47%)。164例(96%)患者存在颈动脉粥样硬化(CA,定义为任何颈动脉斑块),57例(33%)患者存在CAS(收缩期峰值流速[PSV]≥125 cm/秒;直径狭窄≥50%)。15例(9%)患者发现重度CAS(PSV≥230 cm/秒;狭窄≥70%,或近乎闭塞)。多因素分析显示,吸烟和较高的欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(Euroscore)独立预测CAS的存在。与先前报道的接受临床驱动冠状动脉造影的队列(n = 494例患者,年龄≥70岁)相比,本TAVI队列中单侧和双侧CAS≥50%的患病率显著更高(分别为33% vs. 20%,OR = 1.9,P = 0.001;以及13% vs. 6%,OR = 2.3,P = 0.003)。CAS与30天死亡率或卒中发生率无独立相关性。

结论

TAVI患者中CAS的患病率很高,超过了因冠状动脉适应证接受导管检查的患者。CAS对TAVI后临床结局的影响值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of carotid artery stenosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者颈动脉狭窄的患病率及预测因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25585. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
2
Different impact of sex on baseline characteristics and major periprocedural outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve interventions: Results of the multicenter Italian OBSERVANT Registry.不同性别对经导管主动脉瓣介入治疗和外科主动脉瓣置换术围术期主要结局及基线特征的影响:多中心意大利观察性注册研究结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 May;147(5):1529-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.039. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
3
Complete revascularization is not a prerequisite for success in current transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice.在当前经导管主动脉瓣植入术实践中,完全血运重建并不是成功的必要条件。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):867-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients.主动脉瓣狭窄中无缝合瓣环置换术与经导管瓣膜植入术的比较:高危患者 2 种策略的倾向性匹配分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.025. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
5
Extracranial carotid artery stenosis and outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.颅外颈动脉狭窄与接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的预后
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:278-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.107. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
6
Incidence and severity of atherosclerotic cardiovascular artery disease in patients undergoing TAVI.接受经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)的患者中动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的发病率和严重程度。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;31(5):975-85. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0651-9. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.严重左心室收缩功能障碍对经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后住院结局的影响:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 多中心研究倾向匹配人群的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
8
A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients.基于中危手术患者的倾向评分匹配,对经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 1 年死亡率结果进行的 3 中心比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;6(5):443-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.136.
9
Predictors of 6-month poor clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后6个月临床预后不良的预测因素。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Jan;107(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
10
Clinical presentation and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low flow/low gradient severe aortic stenosis.低流量/低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的临床表现及预后
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug 1;84(2):283-90. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25366. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Doppler flow morphology characteristics of epiaortic arteries in aortic valve pathologies: a retrospective study on a cohort of patients with ischemic stroke.主动脉瓣病变时主动脉弓上动脉的多普勒血流形态特征:一项对缺血性脑卒中患者队列的回顾性研究
Ultrasound J. 2023 Jun 7;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13089-023-00327-4.
2
Carotid Occlusion Accentuates Aortic Stenosis and Cardiac Remodeling With Preserved Systolic Function in LDL Receptor-Deficient Mice.颈动脉闭塞加剧了低密度脂蛋白受体缺陷小鼠的主动脉瓣狭窄和心脏重塑,同时保留了收缩功能。
Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 11;11:578722. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.578722. eCollection 2020.
3
In-hospital clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with concomitant carotid artery stenosis: Insights from the national inpatient sample.
伴有颈动脉狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的院内临床结局:来自全国住院患者样本的见解
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Sep 1;31:100621. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100621. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Anticoagulation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Current Status.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的抗凝治疗:现状
Interv Cardiol. 2020 Apr 23;15:e02. doi: 10.15420/icr.2019.24. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
Concomitant transcarotid artery revascularization and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.颈动脉同期血运重建与经导管主动脉瓣置换术
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2020 Apr 15;6(2):205-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.02.006. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
Carotid artery disease and periprocedural stroke risk after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的颈动脉疾病与围手术期卒中风险
Ann Card Anaesth. 2017 Apr-Jun;20(2):145-151. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_13_17.
7
Predictive value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in severe degenerative aortic valve stenosis.血小板与淋巴细胞比值在严重退行性主动脉瓣狭窄中的预测价值。
J Res Med Sci. 2016 Oct 18;21:93. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.192509. eCollection 2016.