Freed Benjamin H, Tsang Wendy, Bhave Nicole M, Patel Amit R, Weinert Lynn, Yamat Megan, Vicedo Beatriz Miralles, Dill Karin, Mor-Avi Victor, Gomberg-Maitland Mardi, Lang Roberto M
University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
Echocardiography. 2015 Feb;32(2):257-63. doi: 10.1111/echo.12662. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
Right ventricular (RV) strain is a potentially useful prognostic marker in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, published reports regarding the accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE)-derived RV strain against an independent reference in this patient population are limited. The aims of this study were: (1) to study the relationship between 2DE RV longitudinal strain and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF) in patients with PAH; (2) to compare 2DE-derived and CMR-derived RV longitudinal strain in these patients; and (3) to determine the reproducibility of these measurements.
Thirty patients with PAH underwent 2DE and CMR imaging within a 2-hour time period. 2DE RV longitudinal strain was measured from a focused RV apical four-chamber view using speckle tracking software. CMR RV longitudinal strain was measured from short-axis slices acquired using fast-strain-encoded sequence. Global peak systolic RV longitudinal strain was calculated for both 2DE and CMR.
RV longitudinal strain using 2DE software correlated well with CMR-derived RVEF (R = 0.69, P = 0.0006). There was moderate agreement when comparing 2DE to CMR RV longitudinal strain (R = 0.74, P = 0.0002; bias -1%, limits of agreement -9 to 7%). Inter-observer variability and intra-observer variability for RV longitudinal strain were lower for 2DE than CMR.
RV longitudinal strain by 2DE provides a good alternative for CMR-derived RVEF in patients with PAH. The moderate agreement in strain measurements between 2DE and CMR suggests that further software improvements are needed before these measurements can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
右心室(RV)应变是肺动脉高压(PAH)患者潜在有用的预后标志物。然而,关于二维超声心动图(2DE)得出的RV应变在该患者群体中相对于独立参考标准的准确性的已发表报告有限。本研究的目的是:(1)研究PAH患者中2DE RV纵向应变与心血管磁共振(CMR)得出的RV射血分数(RVEF)之间的关系;(2)比较这些患者中2DE得出的和CMR得出的RV纵向应变;(3)确定这些测量的可重复性。
30例PAH患者在2小时内接受了2DE和CMR成像。使用斑点追踪软件从聚焦的RV心尖四腔视图测量2DE RV纵向应变。从使用快速应变编码序列采集的短轴切片测量CMR RV纵向应变。计算2DE和CMR的整体峰值收缩期RV纵向应变。
使用2DE软件得出的RV纵向应变与CMR得出的RVEF相关性良好(R = 0.69,P = 0.0006)。比较2DE和CMR RV纵向应变时存在中度一致性(R = 0.74,P = 0.0002;偏差-1%,一致性界限-9%至7%)。2DE的RV纵向应变的观察者间变异性和观察者内变异性低于CMR。
对于PAH患者,2DE得出的RV纵向应变是CMR得出的RVEF的良好替代方法。2DE和CMR之间应变测量的中度一致性表明,在这些测量可在临床实践中互换使用之前,需要进一步改进软件。