Cooke Daniel L, Stout Charles E, Kim Warren T, Kansagra Akash P, Yu John Paul, Gu Amy, Jewell Nicholas P, Hetts Steven W, Higashida Randall T, Dowd Christopher F, Halbach Van V
Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California; San Francisco, CA, USA -
Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California; San Francisco, CA, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):261-74. doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10027. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
Arterial fenestrations are an anatomic variant with indeterminate significance. Given the controversy surrounding fenestrations we sought their prevalence within our practice along with their association with other cerebrovascular anomalies. We retrospectively reviewed 10,927 patients undergoing digital subtraction angiography between 1992 and 2011. Dictated reports were searched for the terms "fenestration" or "fenestrated" with images reviewed for relevance, yielding 228 unique cases. A Medline database search from February 1964 to January 2013 generated 304 citations, 127 cases of which were selected for analysis. Cerebral arterial fenestrations were identified in 228 patients (2.1%). At least one aneurysm was noted in 60.5% of patients, with an aneurysm arising from the fenestration in 19.6% of patients. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage or non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were present in 60.1% and 15.8%, respectively. For the subset of patients with an aneurysm arising directly from a fenestration relative to those patients with an aneurysm not immediately associated with a fenestration, the prevalence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage was 66.7% vs. 58.6% (p = 0.58). Fenestrations were more often within the posterior circulation (73.2%) than the anterior circulation (24.6%), though there was no difference in the prevalence of aneurysms within these groups (61.1% vs. 60.7%, p = 1.0). Cerebral arterial fenestrations are an anatomic variant more often manifesting at the anterior communicating arterial complex and basilar artery and with no definite pathological relationship with aneurysms.
动脉窗是一种意义不确定的解剖变异。鉴于围绕动脉窗存在的争议,我们在自己的医疗实践中探寻了其发生率以及与其他脑血管异常的关联。我们回顾性分析了1992年至2011年间接受数字减影血管造影的10927例患者。在口述报告中搜索“窗”或“有窗的”相关术语,并对图像进行相关性审查,共得到228例独特病例。对1964年2月至2013年1月的医学文献数据库进行搜索,得到304篇引文,从中选取127例进行分析。228例患者(2.1%)被发现存在脑动脉窗。60.5%的患者至少有一个动脉瘤,其中19.6%的患者动脉瘤起源于动脉窗。动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血和非动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血分别占60.1%和15.8%。相对于动脉瘤与动脉窗无直接关联的患者,直接起源于动脉窗的动脉瘤患者中,动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的发生率为66.7%,而前者为58.6%(p = 0.58)。动脉窗在后循环(73.2%)中比在前循环(24.6%)中更常见,不过两组中动脉瘤的发生率无差异(61.1%对60.7%,p = 1.0)。脑动脉窗是一种解剖变异,更常出现在前交通动脉复合体和基底动脉,与动脉瘤无明确的病理关系。