Øyri Karl, Chávez-Santiago Raúl, Støa Stig, Martinsen Ørjan Grøttem, Balasingham Ilangko, Fosse Erik
The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2014 Dec;23(6):341-9. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.931869. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
To evaluate the level of agreement of simulated wired and Wi-Fi vital signs output from an intra-aortic balloon pump during exposure to electromagnetic interference from frequency overlapping ZigBee sensors.
A series of experiments with interference from single and multiple ZigBee sensors were benchmarked with wired and Wi-Fi output. Tests included single ZigBee sensor adjacent and co-channel interference, and multiple ZigBee interferences towards the Wi-Fi receiver and transmitter.
Interference-free differences between wired and wireless aortic blood pressure and electrocardiogram were very small, verified by time domain and Bland - Altman plots. Bland - Altman plots comparing level of agreement in wired and wireless aortic blood pressure and ECG output during interference experiments showed a difference from 0.2 to 0.3 mmHg for blood pressure, and from 0.001 to 0.004 mV for electrocardiogram.
Level of agreement in wired and wireless (Wi-Fi) arterial blood pressure and electrocardiogram during single or multiple sensor interference was high. No clinically relevant degradation of Wi-Fi transmission of aortic blood pressure or ECG signals was observed.
评估在受到来自频率重叠的 ZigBee 传感器的电磁干扰时,主动脉内球囊泵模拟的有线和 Wi-Fi 生命体征输出的一致性水平。
一系列针对来自单个和多个 ZigBee 传感器干扰的实验,以有线和 Wi-Fi 输出作为基准。测试包括单个 ZigBee 传感器的相邻和同信道干扰,以及多个 ZigBee 对 Wi-Fi 接收器和发射器的干扰。
通过时域和 Bland - Altman 图验证,有线和无线主动脉血压及心电图之间的无干扰差异非常小。Bland - Altman 图比较干扰实验期间有线和无线主动脉血压及心电图输出的一致性水平,结果显示血压差异为 0.2 至 0.3 mmHg,心电图差异为 0.001 至 0.004 mV。
在单个或多个传感器干扰期间,有线和无线(Wi-Fi)动脉血压及心电图的一致性水平较高。未观察到主动脉血压或心电图信号的 Wi-Fi 传输出现临床相关的退化。